Cited by 25Hospital Admissions and OutcomesPatient Safety and Medication ErrorsFamily and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units

Improving transitions of care between the operating room and intensive care unit

Open access
Wheeler, Derek S., Sheets, Anna M., Ryckman, Frederick C.·2018·Translational Pediatrics

Abstract

Transitions of care between individual providers or teams of providers have a high potential for errors due to the incomplete transfer of critical information and the need for ongoing care. The transition from the operating room (OR) to the intensive care unit (ICU) is a particularly dangerous time for critically ill children. Hand-offs of care between the OR and ICU teams during this key transition period require detailed communication of complete and accurate patient information at a time when the patient is perhaps most vulnerable from a physiologic standpoint. Improving the safety of transitions from the OR to the ICU is an active area of investigation, though there are a few notable best practices that are commonly employed in a number of centers. These best practices include having the appropriate personnel at the bedside for the hand-off, the use of scripts and the "sterile cockpit rule", the use of checklists, double verification of post-operative orders, and maintaining an overall safety culture.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.21037/tp.2018.09.09

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The data surrounding surgical patients are voluminous and diverse while simultaneously incomplete, which strains the ability of receiving nurses to review and assimilate it de novo.

    “The data surrounding surgical patients are voluminous and diverse while simultaneously incomplete, which strains the ability of receiving nurses to review and assimilate it de novo.8–10”

    From Potential uses of AI for perioperative nursing handoffs: a qualitative study (2023) · cites this paper as [10]

    The Review Article section says OR-to-ICU teams must communicate complete, accurate patient information while continuing to provide care. The Conclusions section also describes ICU nurses needing clarification of missing information after a hand-off. The paper does not say that surgical-patient data are voluminous and diverse or that reviewing and assimilating those data de novo strains receiving nurses. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Handoff-related information gaps are common for postoperative patients.

    “Nevertheless, handoff-related information gaps are common for postoperative patients.10,25–28”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS. editors. To Err is Human: Building a Safer Health System. Washington DC: National Academy Press, 1999.
  2. Reid PP, Compton WD, Grossman JH, et al. editors. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the Twenty-first Century. Washington DC: National Academy Press, 2005.
  3. Rothschild JM, Landrigan CP, Cronin JW, et al. The Critical Care Safety Study: The incidence and nature of adverse events and serious medical errors in intensive care. Crit Care Med 2005;33:1694-700.
  4. McElroy LM, Macapagal KR, Collins KM, et al. Clinician perceptions of operating room to intensive care unit handoffs and implications for patient safety: A qualitative study. Am J Surg 2015;210:629-35.
  5. Gawande AA, Zinner MJ, Studdert DM, et al. Analysis of errors reported by surgeons at three teaching hospitals. Surgery 2003;133:614-21.
  6. Greenberg CC, Regenbogen SE, Studdert DM, et al. Patterns of communication breakdowns resulting in injury to surgical patients. J Am Coll Surg 2007;204:533-40.
  7. Mazzocco K, Pettiti DB, Fong KT, et al. Surgical team behaviors and patient outcomes. Am J Surg 2009;197:678-85.
  8. Riesenberg LA, Leitzsch J, Massucci JL, et al. Residents' and attending physicians' handoffs: A systematic review of the literature. Acad Med 2009;84:1775-87.
  9. McElroy LM, Collins KM, Koller FL, et al. Operating room to intensive care unit handoffs and the risks of patient harm. Surgery 2015;158:588-94.
  10. Segall N, Bonifacio AS, Barbeito A, et al. Operating room- to-ICU patient handover: A multidisciplinary human- centered design approach. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2016;42:400-14.
  11. Mukhopadhyay D, Wiggins-Dohlvik KC, MrDutt MM, et al. Implementation of a standardized handoff protocol for post-operative admissions to the surgical intensive care unit. Am J Surg 2018;215:28-36.
  12. Sorokin R, Riggio JM, Hwang C. Attitudes about patient safety: A survey of physicians-in-training. Am J Med Qual 2005;20:70-7.
  13. Thiagarajan RR, Bird GL, Harrington K, et al. Improving safety for children with cardiac disease. Cardiol Young 2007;17:127-32.
  14. Patterson ES, Roth EM, Woods DD, et al. Handoff strategies in settings with high consequences for failure: Lessons for health care operations. Int J Qual Health Care 2004;16:125-32.
  15. Catchpole K, Sellers R, Goldman A, et al. Patient handovers within the hospital: Translating knowledge from motor racing to healthcare. Qual Saf Health Care 2010;19:318-22.
  16. Catchpole KR, De Leval MR, McEwan A, et al. Patient handover from surgery to intensive care: Using Formula 1 pit-stop and aviation models to improve safety and quality. Paediatr Anaesth 2007;17:470-8.
  17. Gleicher Y, Mosko JD, McGhee I. Improving cardiac operating room to intensive care unit handover using a standardised handover process. BMJ Open Qual 2017;6:e000076.
  18. Rosinski DJ. Sterile cockpit or not: It's all about team and effective communication. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010;140:10-1.
  19. Joy BF, Elliot E, Hardy C, et al. Standardized Translational Pediatrics, Vol 7, No 4 October 2018 © Translational Pediatrics. All rights reserved. Transl Pediatr 2018;7(4):299-307 tp.amegroups.com multidisciplinary protocol improves handover of cardiac surgery patients to the intensive care unit. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2011;12:304-8.
  20. Agarwal HS, Saville BR, Slayton JM, et al. Standardized postoperative handover process improves outcomes in the intensive care unit: A model for operational sustainability and improved team performance. Crit Care Med 2012;40:2109-15.
  21. Zavalkoff SR, Razack SI, Lavoie J, et al. Handover after pediatric heart surgery: A simple tool improves information exchange. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2011;12:309-13.
  22. Craig R, Moxey L, Young D, et al. Strengthening handover communication in pediatric cardiac intensive care. Paediatr Anaesth 2012;22:393-9.
  23. Niedner MF. Pediatric quality improvement: Practical and scholarly considerations. Pediatr Clin North Am 2016;63:341-56.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wheeler, D. S., Sheets, A. M., & Ryckman, F. C.
Affiliations
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Wheeler, Derek S.
Venue
Translational Pediatrics
Published
2018-10
Volume
7
Issue
4
Pages
299-307
ISSN
  • 2224-4336 (ISSN-L)
  • 2224-4344
OpenAlex
W2896941230
Cited by
25
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1
FWCI
4.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Translational Pediatrics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Hospital Admissions and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Patient Safety and Medication Errors
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Radiological and Ultrasound Technology › Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units
Keywords
care transitions, pediatric intensive care, patient safety, checklists, safety culture, critically ill children

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review