Social Epidemiology of Trauma Among 2 American Indian Reservation Populations
Open accessAbstract
Objectives. We examined the prevalence of trauma in 2 large American Indian communities in an attempt to describe demographic correlates and to compare findings with a representative sample of the US population. Methods. We determined differences in exposure to each of 16 types of trauma among 3084 tribal members aged 15 to 57 years through structured interviews. We compared prevalence rates of trauma, by gender, across the 2 tribes and with a sample of the US general population. We used logistic regression analyses to examine the relationships of demographic correlates to trauma exposure. Results. Lifetime exposure rates to at least 1 trauma (62.4%–67.2% among male participants, 66.2%–69.8% among female participants) fell at the upper limits of the range reported by other researchers. Unlike the US general population, female and male American Indians exhibited equivalent levels of overall trauma exposure. Members of both tribes more often witnessed traumatic events, experienced traumas to loved ones, and were victims of physical attacks than their counterparts in the overall US population. Conclusions. American Indians live in adverse environments that place them at high risk for exposure to trauma and harmful health sequelae.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Alaska Native and American Indian peoples have higher rates of adverse experiences than the general population.
“Alaska Native and American Indian (ANAI) peoples have higher rates of adverse experiences than the general population”
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 53 · Cited by 229
- Authors
- Manson, S. M., Beals, J., Klein, S. A., Croy, C. D., & the AI-SUPERPFP Team
- Affiliations
- University of Colorado Health (US)
- ORCID
- Manson, Spero M.
- Venue
- American Journal of Public Health
- Publisher
- American Public Health Association
- Published
- 2005-05
- Volume
- 95
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 851-859
- ISSN
- 0090-0036 (ISSN-L)
- 1541-0048
- PMC
- PMC1449268
- OpenAlex
- W2111601894
- Cited by
- 229
- References
- 53
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 21
- FWCI
- 8.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- American Journal of Public Health (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (P01HS10854, P01 HS010854)
- National Institute of Mental Health (P01MH042473, P01-MH-42473, R01-MH48174, R01MH048174)
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA17803, R01DA017803)
- National Center on Minority Health and Health Disparities
- National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (P60MD000507)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Health › Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
- Keywords
- trauma exposure, Native Americans, tribal population, reservation communities, physical assault, social epidemiology
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Data Collection, Educational Status, Employment, Female, Humans, Indians, North American, Male, Middle Aged, Poverty, Wounds and Injuries, Northwestern United States, Southwestern United States, Prevalence, Logistic Models, Marital Status
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review