The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Black–White Disparity in Pregnancy-Related Mortality From 5 Conditions: Differences in Prevalence and Case-Fatality Rates
Open accessAbstract
Objectives. We sought to determine whether differences in the prevalences of 5 specific pregnancy complications or differences in case fatality rates for those complications explained the disproportionate risk of pregnancy-related mortality for Black women compared with White women in the United States. Methods. We used national data sets to calculate prevalence and case-fatality rates among Black and White women for preeclampsia, eclampsia, abruptio placentae, placenta previa, and postpartum hemorrhage for the years 1988 to 1999. Results. Black women did not have significantly greater prevalence rates than White women. However, Black women with these conditions were 2 to 3 times more likely to die from them than were White women. Conclusions. Higher pregnancy-related mortality among Black women from preeclampsia, eclampsia, abruptio placentae, placenta previa, and postpartum hemorrhage is largely attributable to higher case-fatality rates. Reductions in case-fatality rates may be made by defining more precisely the mechanisms that affect complication severity and risk of death, including complex interactions of biology and health services, and then applying this knowledge in designing interventions that improve pregnancy-related outcomes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Racial/ethnic disparities in pregnancy-related deaths — United States, 2007–2016
Petersen, E. E., Davis, N. L., Goodman, D., Cox, S., Syverson, C., Seed, K., Shapiro-Mendoza, C., Callaghan, W. M., & Barfield, W. (2019) · MMWR Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report · doi:10.15585/mmwr.mm6835a3 · Cited by 880
Self-citationAlgorithmic fairness in artificial intelligence for medicine and healthcare
Chen, R. J., Wang, J. J., Williamson, D. F. K., Chen, T. Y., Lipkova, J., Lu, M. Y., Sahai, S., & Mahmood, F. (2023) · Nature Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1038/s41551-023-01056-8 · Cited by 750
Can AI Help Reduce Disparities in General Medical and Mental Health Care?
(2019) · AMA Journal of Ethics · doi:10.1001/amajethics.2019.167 · Cited by 401
Admon, L. K., Winkelman, T. N. A., Zivin, K., Terplan, M., Mhyre, J. M., & Dalton, V. K. (2018) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/aog.0000000000002937 · Cited by 292
Overview of Maternal Mortality in the United States
Callaghan, W. M. (2012) · Seminars in Perinatology · doi:10.1053/j.semperi.2011.09.002 · Cited by 170
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Tucker, M. J., Berg, C. J., Callaghan, W. M., & Hsia, J.
- Venue
- American Journal of Public Health
- Publisher
- American Public Health Association
- Published
- 2007-02
- Volume
- 97
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 247-251
- ISSN
- 0090-0036 (ISSN-L)
- 1541-0048
- OpenAlex
- W2146718751
- Cited by
- 276
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Black–White Disparity in Pregnancy-Related Mortality From 5 Conditions: Differences in Prevalence and Case-Fatality Rates. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2105/ajph.2005.072975
- The paper
- Tucker, M. J., Berg, C. J., Callaghan, W. M., & Hsia, J. (2007). The Black–White Disparity in Pregnancy-Related Mortality From 5 Conditions: Differences in Prevalence and Case-Fatality Rates. American Journal of Public Health. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.2005.072975
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.