Association Between Availability and Quality of Health Services in Schools and Reproductive Health Outcomes Among Students: A Multilevel Observational Study
Open accessAbstract
Objectives. We determined the association between availability and quality of school health services and reproductive health outcomes among sexually active students. Methods. We used a 2-stage random sampling cluster design to collect nationally representative data from 9107 students from 96 New Zealand high schools. Students self-reported whether they were sexually active, how often they used condoms or contraception, and their involvement in pregnancy. School administrators completed questionnaires on their school-based health services, including doctor and nursing hours per week, team-based services, and health screening. We conducted analyses using multilevel models controlling for individual variables, with schools treated as random effects. Results. There was an inverse association between hours of nursing and doctor time and pregnancy involvement among sexually active students, with fewer pregnancies among students in schools with more than 10 hours of nursing and doctor time per 100 students. There was no association between doctor visits, team-based services, health screening, and reproductive health outcomes. Conclusions. School health services are associated with fewer pregnancies among students, but only when the availability of doctor and nursing time exceeds 10 hours per 100 students per week.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
One study reported improved contraceptive use associated with increased hours of SBHC availability.
“One study52 reported improved contraceptive use associated with increased hours of SBHC availability.”
From School-Based Health Centers to Advance Health Equity (2016) · cites this paper as [52]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 23 · Cited by 24
- Authors
- Denny, S., Robinson, E., Lawler, C., Bagshaw, S., Farrant, B., Bell, F., Dawson, D., Nicholson, D., Hart, M., Fleming, T., Ameratunga, S., Clark, T., Kekus, M., & Utter, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Auckland (NZ)
- Venue
- American Journal of Public Health
- Publisher
- American Public Health Association
- Published
- 2012-10
- Volume
- 102
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- e14-e20
- ISSN
- 0090-0036 (ISSN-L)
- 1541-0048
- PMC
- PMC3490681
- OpenAlex
- W2017013802
- Cited by
- 24
- References
- 23
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3
- FWCI
- 7.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- American Journal of Public Health (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- ResearchSpace (University of Auckland) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › School Health and Nursing Education
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
- Keywords
- school health services, reproductive outcomes, adolescent pregnancy, contraceptive use, condom use, nursing time, health service availability, health service quality, high school students, New Zealand
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Child, Female, Health Services Accessibility, Humans, Male, New Zealand, Quality of Health Care, Surveys and Questionnaires, School Health Services, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Safe Sex, Qualitative Research, Reproductive Health
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review