Cited by 316Health Policy Implementation ScienceAcademic Publishing and Open AccessInterdisciplinary Research and Collaboration

Designing for dissemination among public health researchers: findings from a national survey in the United States

Open access
Brownson, Ross C., Jacobs, Julie A., Tabak, Rachel G., Hoehner, Christine M., Stamatakis, Katherine A.·2013·American Journal of Public Health

Abstract

Objectives. We have described the practice of designing for dissemination among researchers in the United States with the intent of identifying gaps and areas for improvement. Methods. In 2012, we conducted a cross-sectional study of 266 researchers using a search of the top 12 public health journals in PubMed and lists available from government-sponsored research. The sample involved scientists at universities, the National Institutes of Health, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in the United States. Results. In the pooled sample, 73% of respondents estimated they spent less than 10% of their time on dissemination. About half of respondents (53%) had a person or team in their unit dedicated to dissemination. Seventeen percent of all respondents used a framework or theory to plan their dissemination activities. One third of respondents (34%) always or usually involved stakeholders in the research process. Conclusions. The current data and the existing literature suggest considerable room for improvement in designing for dissemination.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2105/ajph.2012.301165

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some type 1 studies focus more intensely on implementability before the effectiveness trial begins by including dissemination and implementation components in the initial study design process.

    “However, some type 1 studies are doing more intense focus on implementability in developing or adapting an intervention before the effectiveness trial begins by including dissemination and implementation components in the initial study design process (Brownson et al., 2013).”

    From An introduction to effectiveness-implementation hybrid designs (2019) · cites this paper as Brownson et al., 2013

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 46 · Cited by 316

Authors
Brownson, R. C., Jacobs, J. A., Tabak, R. G., Hoehner, C. M., & Stamatakis, K. A.
Affiliations
Washington University in St. Louis (US)
Venue
American Journal of Public Health
Published
2013-09
Volume
103
Issue
9
Pages
1693-1699
ISSN
  • 0090-0036 (ISSN-L)
  • 1541-0048
OpenAlex
W2159948545
Cited by
316
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 48 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
21.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Public Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (KL2TR000450, UL1TR000448, TL1TR000449)
  • National Cancer Institute (U54CA155496, U48/CA155496)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (P30DK092950)
  • National Center for Research Resources
  • National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion (U48-DP-001903)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Academic Publishing and Open Access
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
Keywords
research dissemination, public health research, dissemination strategy, stakeholder engagement, research translation
MeSH terms
Workforce, Cross-Sectional Studies, Humans, Public Health, Surveys and Questionnaires, Research Personnel, United States, Information Dissemination

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review