Cited by 19

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Intended and Unintended Consequences of a Legal Measure to Cut the Flow of Illegal Cigarettes Into New York City: The Case of the South Bronx

Kurti, Marin, von Lampe, Klaus, Johnson, Jacqueline·2015·American Journal of Public Health

Abstract

Objectives. We examined the impact of a change in New York tax law on the numbers of untaxed cigarettes bootlegged from Native American reservations and resold in the South Bronx. Methods. Discarded cigarette packs were systematically collected in 30 randomized South Bronx census tracks before and after the amended tax law went into effect in 2011. Also, administrative data were gathered on the number of taxed cigarettes sold in New York State, including sales to Native American reservations. Results. Before the tax amendment, 42% of discarded cigarette packs collected in the South Bronx had no tax stamp. After the tax law went into effect, the percentage of cigarette packs without tax stamps declined to 6.2%. Simultaneously, the percentage of packs with out-of-state tax stamps rose from 18.3% to 66.3%. The percentage of packs with a combined New York State and New York City tax stamp did not change after the tax amendment. Conclusions. After the tax amendment, the supply of contraband cigarettes appears to have quickly shifted from one lower-priced jurisdiction to another without a change in the overall prevalence of contraband cigarettes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2105/ajph.2014.302340

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Merriman D, 2010, Am Econ J, 2, 61
  2. 10.17310/ntj.2013.3.05 · DOI
  3. 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2013-051244 · DOI
  4. 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050412 · DOI
  5. 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050205 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Garrison LR, 2005, J State Taxation, 23, 11

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Kurti, M., von Lampe, K., & Johnson, J.
Affiliations
Marin Kurti is with the School of Criminal Justice, Rutgers University, Newark, NJ. Klaus von Lampe is with the Department of Law, Police Science and Criminal Justice Administration, John Jay College of Criminal Justice, New York, NY. Jacqueline Johnson is with the Department of Anthropology and Sociology, Adelphi University, Garden City, NY.
Venue
American Journal of Public Health
Published
2015-04
Volume
105
Issue
4
Pages
750-756
ISSN
  • 0090-0036
  • 1541-0048
Cited by
19
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review