Cited by 31LGBTQ Health, Identity, and PolicyGender and Feminist StudiesHIV/AIDS Research and Interventions

Changes in Reported Sexual Orientation Following US States Recognition of Same-Sex Couples

Open access
Charlton, Brittany M., Corliss, Heather L., Spiegelman, Donna, Williams, Kerry, Austin, S. Bryn·2016·American Journal of Public Health

Abstract

Objectives. To compare changes in self-reported sexual orientation of women living in states with any recognition of same-sex relationships (e.g., hospital visitation, domestic partnerships) with those of women living in states without such recognition. Methods. We calculated the likelihood of women in the Nurses’ Health Study II (n = 69 790) changing their reported sexual orientation between 1995 and 2009. Results. We used data from the Nurses’ Health Study II and found that living in a state with same-sex relationship recognition was associated with changing one’s reported sexual orientation, particularly from heterosexual to sexual minority. Individuals who reported being heterosexual in 1995 were 30% more likely to report a minority orientation (i.e., bisexual or lesbian) in 2009 (risk ratio = 1.30; 95% confidence interval = 1.05, 1.61) if they lived in a state with any recognition of same-sex relationships compared with those who lived in a state without such recognition. Conclusions. Policies recognizing same-sex relationships may encourage women to report a sexual minority orientation. Future research is needed to clarify how other social and legal policies may affect sexual orientation self-reports.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2105/ajph.2016.303449

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Charlton, B. M., Corliss, H. L., Spiegelman, D., Williams, K., & Austin, S. B.
Affiliations
Boston Children's Hospital (US)
Venue
American Journal of Public Health
Published
2016-12
Volume
106
Issue
12
Pages
2202-2204
ISSN
  • 0090-0036 (ISSN-L)
  • 1541-0048
OpenAlex
W2529973366
Cited by
31
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2
FWCI
4.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Public Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Cancer Institute (UM1CA176726, T32CA009001)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD066963, L30 HD081563, R01HD057368, F32HD084000, T32HD060454, R01HD045763)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
Keywords
sexual orientation, same-sex marriage, domestic partnerships, sexual minority identity, bisexual women, lesbians, state policy, women, Nurses' Health Study II
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Homosexuality, Humans, Male, Self Disclosure, Sexual Behavior, United States, Spouses, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review