Cited by 129Food Security and Health in Diverse PopulationsDiabetes Management and EducationDiabetes Management and Research

Comprehensive Diabetes Self-Management Support From Food Banks: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Open access
Seligman, Hilary K., Smith, Morgan, Rosenmoss, Sophie, Marshall, Michelle Berger, Waxman, Elaine·2018·American Journal of Public Health

Abstract

Objectives. To determine whether food bank provision of self-management support and diabetes-appropriate food improves glycemic control among clients with diabetes. Methods. We screened 5329 adults for diabetes at food pantries (n = 27) affiliated with food banks in Oakland, California; Detroit, Michigan; and Houston, Texas, between October 2015 and September 2016. We individually randomized 568 participants with hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) 7.5% or greater to waitlist control or 6-month intervention including food, diabetes education, health care referral, and glucose monitoring. The primary outcome was HbA1c at 6 months. Results. Food security (relative risk [RR] = 0.85; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.73, 0.98), food stability (RR = 0.77; 95% CI = 0.64, 0.93), and fruit and vegetable intake (risk difference [RD] = 0.34; 95% CI = 0.34, 0.34) significantly improved among intervention participants. There were no differences in self-management (depressive symptoms, diabetes distress, self-care, hypoglycemia, self-efficacy) or HbA1c (RD = 0.24; 95% CI = −0.09, 0.58). Conclusions. Food banks are ideally situated to provide diabetes-appropriate food to food-insecure households. Effective strategies for food banks to support improvements in diabetes clinical outcomes require additional study. Public Health Implications. Moving chronic disease support from clinics into communities expands reach into vulnerable populations. However, it is unclear how community interventions should be integrated with clinical care to improve disease outcomes. Trial Registration Number. NCT02569060

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2105/ajph.2018.304528

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Restricting our review to health care-based studies also excluded potentially informative FI interventions that examine health outcomes but take place in non-health care settings.

    “Restricting our review to health care-based studies also excluded potentially informative FI interventions that examine health outcomes but take place in non-health care settings. 46,47”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 25 · Cited by 129

Authors
Seligman, H. K., Smith, M., Rosenmoss, S., Marshall, M. B., & Waxman, E.
Affiliations
University of California, San Francisco (US)
Venue
American Journal of Public Health
Published
2018-09
Volume
108
Issue
9
Pages
1227-1234
ISSN
  • 0090-0036 (ISSN-L)
  • 1541-0048
OpenAlex
W2882987858
Cited by
129
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 1
FWCI
16.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Public Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
  • Laura and John Arnold Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (P30DK098722, P30DK092924)
  • National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion (U48 DP004998)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
Keywords
diabetes self-management support, food banks, food insecurity, glycemic control, HbA1c, diabetes education, glucose monitoring, food stability, fruit and vegetable intake, food pantries, diabetes distress, self-efficacy
MeSH terms
Self-Management, Adult, Aged, Charities, Diabetes Mellitus, Food Supply, Humans, Michigan, Middle Aged, Texas, United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review