Comprehensive Diabetes Self-Management Support From Food Banks: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Open accessAbstract
Objectives. To determine whether food bank provision of self-management support and diabetes-appropriate food improves glycemic control among clients with diabetes. Methods. We screened 5329 adults for diabetes at food pantries (n = 27) affiliated with food banks in Oakland, California; Detroit, Michigan; and Houston, Texas, between October 2015 and September 2016. We individually randomized 568 participants with hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) 7.5% or greater to waitlist control or 6-month intervention including food, diabetes education, health care referral, and glucose monitoring. The primary outcome was HbA1c at 6 months. Results. Food security (relative risk [RR] = 0.85; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.73, 0.98), food stability (RR = 0.77; 95% CI = 0.64, 0.93), and fruit and vegetable intake (risk difference [RD] = 0.34; 95% CI = 0.34, 0.34) significantly improved among intervention participants. There were no differences in self-management (depressive symptoms, diabetes distress, self-care, hypoglycemia, self-efficacy) or HbA1c (RD = 0.24; 95% CI = −0.09, 0.58). Conclusions. Food banks are ideally situated to provide diabetes-appropriate food to food-insecure households. Effective strategies for food banks to support improvements in diabetes clinical outcomes require additional study. Public Health Implications. Moving chronic disease support from clinics into communities expands reach into vulnerable populations. However, it is unclear how community interventions should be integrated with clinical care to improve disease outcomes. Trial Registration Number. NCT02569060
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Restricting our review to health care-based studies also excluded potentially informative FI interventions that examine health outcomes but take place in non-health care settings.
“Restricting our review to health care-based studies also excluded potentially informative FI interventions that examine health outcomes but take place in non-health care settings. 46,47”
From Interventions Addressing Food Insecurity in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review (2019) · cites this paper as [47]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 25 · Cited by 129
- Authors
- Seligman, H. K., Smith, M., Rosenmoss, S., Marshall, M. B., & Waxman, E.
- Affiliations
- University of California, San Francisco (US)
- Venue
- American Journal of Public Health
- Publisher
- American Public Health Association
- Published
- 2018-09
- Volume
- 108
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1227-1234
- ISSN
- 0090-0036 (ISSN-L)
- 1541-0048
- PMC
- PMC6085038
- OpenAlex
- W2882987858
- Cited by
- 129
- References
- 25
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 16.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- American Journal of Public Health (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
- Laura and John Arnold Foundation
- National Institutes of Health
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (P30DK098722, P30DK092924)
- National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion (U48 DP004998)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Keywords
- diabetes self-management support, food banks, food insecurity, glycemic control, HbA1c, diabetes education, glucose monitoring, food stability, fruit and vegetable intake, food pantries, diabetes distress, self-efficacy
- MeSH terms
- Self-Management, Adult, Aged, Charities, Diabetes Mellitus, Food Supply, Humans, Michigan, Middle Aged, Texas, United States
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review