Intimate Partner Violence in Transgender Populations: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Prevalence and Correlates
Open accessAbstract
Background: Transgender individuals experience unique vulnerabilities to intimate partner violence (IPV) and may experience a disproportionate IPV burden compared with cisgender (nontransgender) individuals. Objectives: To systematically review the quantitative literature on prevalence and correlates of IPV in transgender populations. Search Methods: Authors searched research databases (PubMed, CINAHL), gray literature (Google), journal tables of contents, and conference abstracts, and consulted experts in the field. Authors were contacted with data requests in cases in which transgender participants were enrolled in a study, but no disaggregated statistics were provided for this population. Selection Criteria: We included all quantitative literature published before July 2019 on prevalence and correlates of IPV victimization, perpetration, or service utilization in transgender populations. There were no restrictions by sample size, year, or location. Data Collection and Analysis: Two independent reviewers conducted screening. One reviewer conducted extraction by using a structured database, and a second reviewer checked for mistakes or omissions. We used random-effects meta-analyses to calculate relative risks (RRs) comparing the prevalence of IPV in transgender individuals and cisgender individuals in studies in which both transgender and cisgender individuals were enrolled. We also used meta-analysis to compare IPV prevalence in assigned-female-sex-at-birth and assigned-male-sex-at-birth transgender individuals and to compare physical IPV prevalence between nonbinary and binary transgender individuals in studies that enrolled both groups. Main Results: We identified 85 articles from 74 unique data sets (n total = 49 966 transgender participants). Across studies reporting it, the median lifetime prevalence of physical IPV was 37.5%, lifetime sexual IPV was 25.0%, past-year physical IPV was 16.7%, and past-year sexual IPV was 10.8% among transgender individuals. Compared with cisgender individuals, transgender individuals were 1.7 times more likely to experience any IPV (RR = 1.66; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.36, 2.03), 2.2 times more likely to experience physical IPV (RR = 2.19; 95% CI = 1.66, 2.88), and 2.5 times more likely to experience sexual IPV (RR = 2.46; 95% CI = 1.64, 3.69). Disparities persisted when comparing to cisgender women specifically. There was no significant difference in any IPV, physical IPV, or sexual IPV prevalence between assigned-female-sex-at-birth and assigned-male-sex-at-birth individuals, nor in physical IPV prevalence between binary- and nonbinary-identified transgender individuals. IPV victimization was associated with sexual risk, substance use, and mental health burden in transgender populations. Authors’ Conclusions: Transgender individuals experience a dramatically higher prevalence of IPV victimization compared with cisgender individuals, regardless of sex assigned at birth. IPV prevalence estimates are comparably high for assigned-male-sex-at-birth and assigned-female-sex-at-birth transgender individuals, and for binary and nonbinary transgender individuals, though more research is needed. Public Health Implications: Evidence-based interventions are urgently needed to prevent and address IPV in this high-risk population with unique needs. Lack of legal protections against discrimination in employment, housing, and social services likely foster vulnerability to IPV. Transgender individuals should be explicitly included in US Preventive Services Task Force recommendations promoting IPV screening in primary care settings. Interventions at the policy level as well as the interpersonal and individual level are urgently needed to address epidemic levels of IPV in this marginalized, high-risk population.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The risk of IPV exposure is often higher in gender-diverse populations than in cisgender individuals.
“This experience is equally relevant across gender-diverse populations, where the risk of IPV exposure is often higher than in cisgender individuals (Craft & Serovich, 2005;Peitzmeier et al., 2020;Rolle et al., 2018).”
From The Intergenerational Transmission of Emotional Intimate Partner Violence: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2025) · cites this paper as Peitzmeier et al., 2020
Cites
Johns, M. M., Lowry, R., Andrzejewski, J., Barrios, L. C., Demissie, Z., McManus, T., Rasberry, C. N., Robin, L., & Underwood, J. M. (2019) · MMWR Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report · doi:10.15585/mmwr.mm6803a3 · Cited by 746 · see citing works
Nemoto, T., Bödeker, B., & Iwamoto, M. (2011) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.2010.197285 · Cited by 410 · see citing works
Logie, C. H., Wang, Y., Lacombe‐Duncan, A., Jones, N., Ahmed, U., Levermore, K., Neil, A., Ellis, T., Bryan, N., Marshall, A., et al. (2017) · Journal of the International AIDS Society · doi:10.7448/ias.20.01/21422 · Cited by 78 · cited 1× · see citing works
“” ), 17% (n = 12/71) 11,29,31,32,35,38,44,48,55,56,58,70 of studies used nonbehavioral measures (e.g., “ Have you ever experienced domestic violence?”
Background
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Osborne, K.-L., Munasinghe, S., & Page, A. (2025) · Journal of Family Violence · doi:10.1007/s10896-025-00871-8 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
- Authors
- Peitzmeier, S. M., Malik, M., Kattari, S. K., Marrow, E., Stephenson, R., Agénor, M., & Reisner, S. L.
- Affiliations
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- American Journal of Public Health
- Publisher
- American Public Health Association
- Published
- 2020-09
- Volume
- 110
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- e1-e14
- ISSN
- 0090-0036 (ISSN-L)
- 1541-0048
- PMC
- PMC7427218
- OpenAlex
- W3043152208
- Cited by
- 454
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 70 · 2025: 93 · 2024: 108 · 2023: 84 · 2022: 53 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 6.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- American Journal of Public Health (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
- Keywords
- intimate partner violence, transgender people, physical violence, sexual violence, IPV perpetration, gender identity, cisgender women, IPV prevalence, risk factors for violence, victimization, gender dysphoria, gender dysphoria treatment, gender-affirming hormone therapy, gender-affirming surgery, gender-affirming care
- MeSH terms
- Intimate Partner Violence, Mental Disorders, Female, Humans, Male, Risk Factors, Prevalence, Crime Victims, Substance-Related Disorders, Transgender Persons
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review