The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Women, work and coronary heart disease: prospective findings from the Framingham heart study.
Abstract
This study examined the relationship of employment status and employment-related behaviors to the incidence of coronary heart disease (CHD) in women. Between 1965 and 1967, a psychosocial questionnaire was administered to 350 housewives, 387 working women (women who had been employed outside the home over one-half their adult years), and 580 men participating in the Framingham Heart Study. The respondents were 45 to 64 years of age and were followed for the development of CHD over the ensuing eight years. Regardless of employment status, women reported significantly more symptoms of emotional distress than men. Working women and men were more likely to report Type A behavior, ambitiousness, and marital disagreements than were housewives; working women experienced more job mobility than men, and more daily stress and marital dissatisfaction than housewives or men. Working women did not have significantly higher incidence rates of CHD than housewives (7.8 vs 5.4 per cent, respectively). However, CHD rates were almost twice as great among women holding clerical jobs (10.6 per cent) as compared to housewives. The most significant predictors of CHD among clerical workers were: suppressed hostility, having a nonsupportive boss, and decreased job mobility. CHD rates were higher among working women who had ever married, especially among those who had raised three or more children. Among working women, clerical workers who had children and were married to blue collar workers were a highest risk of developing CHD (21.3 per cent).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
FREQUENCY OF RISK FACTORS FOR ISCHÆMIC HEART-DISEASE IN A HEALTHY BRITISH POPULATION
Lewis, B., Wootton, I. D. P., Krikler, D. M., February, A., Chait, A., Oakley, C. M., Sigurdsson, G., Maurer, B., & Birkhead, J. (1974) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(74)92438-6 · Cited by 165
Cited by
Human Aging: Usual and Successful
Rowe, J. W., & Kahn, R. L. (1987) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.3299702 · Cited by 3,384
Socioeconomic factors and cardiovascular disease: a review of the literature.
Kaplan, G. A., & Keil, J. E. (1993) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.88.4.1973 · Cited by 1,845
Suls, J., & Bunde, J. (2005) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.131.2.260 · Cited by 878
Going to the heart of the matter
Kubzansky, L. D., & Kawachi, I. (2000) · Journal of Psychosomatic Research · doi:10.1016/s0022-3999(99)00091-4 · Cited by 442
The changing organization of work and the safety and health of working people: a commentary
Landsbergis, P. A. (2003) · Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine · doi:10.1097/00043764-200301000-00014 · Cited by 227
Metadata
- Authors
- Haynes, S. G., & Feinleib, M.
- Venue
- American Journal of Public Health
- Publisher
- American Public Health Association
- Published
- 1980-02
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 133-141
- ISSN
- 0090-0036 (ISSN-L)
- 1541-0048
- OpenAlex
- W2001635628
- Cited by
- 428
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 68.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.