The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The influence of patient-practitioner agreement on outcome of care.
Abstract
A previous study suggested that patient-practitioner agreement and follow-up in ambulatory care facilitates problem resolution as judged by patients. In this study in another medical practice, practitioner-patient agreement on what problems required follow-up was associated with greater problem resolution as judged by the practitioners regardless of the severity of the problems. In this study, patients did not judge problems mentioned only by themselves to be less improved than problems mentioned by both them and their practitioners. However, in this study more of the problems mentioned only by patients were mentioned in the note of the visit contained in the medical record. Patients expected less and reported less improvements of problems that were neither mentioned by the practitioner nor written in the medical record than was the case for problems listed both by patients and practitioners. The findings of this study confirm those of the previous study in suggesting that practitioner-patient agreement about problems is associated with greater expectations for improvement and with better outcome as perceived by patients. In addition, they indicate that practitioners also report better outcome under the same circumstances.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Effective physician-patient communication and health outcomes: a review.
(1995) · Europe PMC (PubMed Central) · Cited by 4,085
Assessing the Effects of Physician-Patient Interactions on the Outcomes of Chronic Disease
Kaplan, S. H., Greenfield, S., & Ware, J. E. (1989) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-198903001-00010 · Cited by 2,043
Kinmonth, A. L., Woodcock, A., Griffin, S., Spiegal, N., & Campbell, M. J. (1998) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.317.7167.1202 · Cited by 474
Patient involvement in treatment decision-making: The case for a broader conceptual framework
Entwistle, V. A., & Watt, I. S. (2006) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2006.05.002 · Cited by 314
Squier, R. W. (1990) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/0277-9536(90)90188-x · Cited by 305
Metadata
- Authors
- Starfield, B., Wray, C., Hess, K., Gross, R., Birk, P. S., & D'Lugoff, B. C.
- Venue
- American Journal of Public Health
- Publisher
- American Public Health Association
- Published
- 1981-02
- Volume
- 71
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 127-131
- ISSN
- 0090-0036 (ISSN-L)
- 1541-0048
- OpenAlex
- W2146928699
- Cited by
- 365
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 32.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The influence of patient-practitioner agreement on outcome of care. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2105/ajph.71.2.127
- The paper
- Starfield, B., Wray, C., Hess, K., Gross, R., Birk, P. S., & D'Lugoff, B. C. (1981). The influence of patient-practitioner agreement on outcome of care. American Journal of Public Health. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.71.2.127
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.