Cited by 22Maternal and Perinatal Health InterventionsOccupational and Professional Licensing RegulationHealthcare Regulation

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

State laws and the practice of lay midwifery.

Open access
Butter, I H, Kay, B J·1988·American Journal of Public Health

Abstract

A national survey was conducted to assess the current status and characteristics of state legislation regulating the practice of lay midwives. As of July 1987, 10 states have prohibitory laws, five states have grandmother clauses authorizing practicing midwives under repealed statutes, five states have enabling laws which are not used, and 10 states explicitly permit lay midwives to practice. In the 21 remaining states, the legal status of midwives is unclear. Much of the enabling legislation restricts midwifery practice often resulting in situations similar to those in states with prohibitory laws. Given the growth of an extensive grassroots movement of lay midwives committed to quality of care, this outcome suggests that 21 states with no legislation may provide better opportunities for midwifery practice than states with enabling laws.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2105/ajph.78.9.1161

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. 10.2105/AJPH.73.6.635 · DOI
  2. 10.2105/AJPH.76.9.1147 · DOI
  3. Evenson D: Midwives: Survival of an ancient profession. Women's Rights Law Reporter 1982; 7:313-330.
  4. Wolfson C, 1986, Hastings Law J, 37, 909
  5. 10.1300/J013v06n03_02 · DOI
  6. Sallomi P, 1981, Mothering, 21, 1
  7. 10.1016/0091-2182(84)90027-2 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/0277-9536(84)90369-1 · DOI
  9. National Center for Health Statistics, 1986, MD: NCHS, 35, 24
  10. DeVries R: Regulating birth: Midwives, medicine, and the law. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1985.
  11. Steinbring J, 1986, MANA News, 3, 1
  12. 1987, MANA News, 4, 2
  13. Gerritsen L, 1987, MANA News, 4
  14. Glass S: Standards & Practice Report on Peer Review.MANA News 1987; 4(4):(Suppl).
  15. 10.2190/MUVW-3R3K-2725-DGH4 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Butter, I. H., & Kay, B. J.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Venue
American Journal of Public Health
Published
1988-09
Volume
78
Issue
9
Pages
1161-1169
ISSN
  • 0090-0036 (ISSN-L)
  • 1541-0048
OpenAlex
W2089937366
Cited by
22
References
0
Citations by year
2020: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
4.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Public Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Law › Occupational and Professional Licensing Regulation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Healthcare Regulation
Keywords
midwife licensing, state legislation, midwifery regulation, quality of care
MeSH terms
Data Collection, Legislation as Topic, Licensure, Midwifery, United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review