The DOI matches its Crossref record.
State laws and the practice of lay midwifery.
Open accessAbstract
A national survey was conducted to assess the current status and characteristics of state legislation regulating the practice of lay midwives. As of July 1987, 10 states have prohibitory laws, five states have grandmother clauses authorizing practicing midwives under repealed statutes, five states have enabling laws which are not used, and 10 states explicitly permit lay midwives to practice. In the 21 remaining states, the legal status of midwives is unclear. Much of the enabling legislation restricts midwifery practice often resulting in situations similar to those in states with prohibitory laws. Given the growth of an extensive grassroots movement of lay midwives committed to quality of care, this outcome suggests that 21 states with no legislation may provide better opportunities for midwifery practice than states with enabling laws.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Michigan did not require a license for midwives.
“| Michigan | No | |”
From The Effect of Occupational Licensing on Consumer Welfare: Early Midwifery Laws and Maternal Mortality (2016) · cites this paper as Butter and Kay 1988
Montana did not require a license for midwives.
“| Montana | No | |”
From The Effect of Occupational Licensing on Consumer Welfare: Early Midwifery Laws and Maternal Mortality (2016) · cites this paper as Butter and Kay 1988
Iowa did not require a license for midwives.
“| Iowa | No | |”
From The Effect of Occupational Licensing on Consumer Welfare: Early Midwifery Laws and Maternal Mortality (2016) · cites this paper as Butter and Kay 1988
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 15
- 10.2105/AJPH.73.6.635 · DOI
- 10.2105/AJPH.76.9.1147 · DOI
- Evenson D: Midwives: Survival of an ancient profession. Women's Rights Law Reporter 1982; 7:313-330.
- Wolfson C, 1986, Hastings Law J, 37, 909
- 10.1300/J013v06n03_02 · DOI
- Sallomi P, 1981, Mothering, 21, 1
- 10.1016/0091-2182(84)90027-2 · DOI
- 10.1016/0277-9536(84)90369-1 · DOI
- National Center for Health Statistics, 1986, MD: NCHS, 35, 24
- DeVries R: Regulating birth: Midwives, medicine, and the law. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1985.
- Steinbring J, 1986, MANA News, 3, 1
- 1987, MANA News, 4, 2
- Gerritsen L, 1987, MANA News, 4
- Glass S: Standards & Practice Report on Peer Review.MANA News 1987; 4(4):(Suppl).
- 10.2190/MUVW-3R3K-2725-DGH4 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Anderson, D. M., Brown, R., Charles, K. K., & Rees, D. (2016) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w22456 · Cited by 19
Metadata
- Authors
- Butter, I. H., & Kay, B. J.
- Affiliations
- University of Michigan (US)
- Venue
- American Journal of Public Health
- Publisher
- American Public Health Association
- Published
- 1988-09
- Volume
- 78
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1161-1169
- ISSN
- 0090-0036 (ISSN-L)
- 1541-0048
- PMC
- PMC1349386
- OpenAlex
- W2089937366
- Cited by
- 22
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2020: 1 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 4.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- American Journal of Public Health (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
- Social Sciences › Law › Occupational and Professional Licensing Regulation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Healthcare Regulation
- Keywords
- midwife licensing, state legislation, midwifery regulation, quality of care
- MeSH terms
- Data Collection, Legislation as Topic, Licensure, Midwifery, United States
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review