The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Hospital nurses' occupational exposure to blood: prospective, retrospective, and institutional reports.
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVES: This study examined nurses risk of exposure to blood resulting from injuries with needles and sharps, the methods of estimating those risks, and the factors affecting risks. METHODS: Nurses on 40 medical units in 20 hospitals in cities with a high incidence of AIDS were studied. Percutaneous injuries were documented for every shift during a 30-day period. These prospective reports were compared with retrospective and institutional reports. Factors affecting the likelihood of injuries were explored. RESULTS: Based on the prospective reports, the rate of injuries to staff nurses was 0.8 per nurse-year. Prospective and retrospective rates were similar, while institutional rates were significantly lower. Factors associated with increased injuries included recapping needles and temporary work assignments. Working in hospitals characterized by professional nurse practice models and taking precautions to avoid blood contact were associated with fewer injuries. CONCLUSIONS: Injuries from needlesticks are more common than institutional reports suggest and do not occur at random. Diminishing the frequency with which nurses recap needles, increasing precautions they take, reducing use of temporary nursing personnel, and implementing organizational changes may lower the odds of nurses being injured.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Nurse Burnout and Patient Satisfaction
Vahey, D. C., Aiken, L. H., Sloane, D. M., Clarke, S. P., & Vargas, D. (2004) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/01.mlr.0000109126.50398.5a · Cited by 977
Self-citationMeasuring Organizational Traits of Hospitals: The Revised Nursing Work Index
Aiken, L. H., & Patrician, P. A. (2000) · Nursing Research · doi:10.1097/00006199-200005000-00006 · Cited by 865
Self-citationTemporary employment and health: a review
Virtanen, M., Kivimäki, M., Joensuu, M., Virtanen, P., Elovainio, M., & Vahtera, J. (2005) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dyi024 · Cited by 784
Gershon, R. R. M., Karkashian, C. D., Grosch, J. W., Murphy, L. R., Escamilla-Cejudo, A., Flanagan, P. A., Bernacki, E., Kasting, C., & Martin, L. (2000) · American Journal of Infection Control · doi:10.1067/mic.2000.105288 · Cited by 462
Hospital staffing, organization, and quality of care: Cross-national findings
Aiken, L. H., Clarke, S. P., & Sloane, D. M. (2002) · Nursing Outlook · doi:10.1067/mno.2002.126696 · Cited by 447
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Aiken, L. H., Sloane, D. M., & Klocinski, J. L.
- Venue
- American Journal of Public Health
- Publisher
- American Public Health Association
- Published
- 1997-01
- Volume
- 87
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 103-107
- ISSN
- 0090-0036 (ISSN-L)
- 1541-0048
- OpenAlex
- W2078950663
- Cited by
- 197
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hospital nurses' occupational exposure to blood: prospective, retrospective, and institutional reports. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2105/ajph.87.1.103
- The paper
- Aiken, L. H., Sloane, D. M., & Klocinski, J. L. (1997). Hospital nurses' occupational exposure to blood: prospective, retrospective, and institutional reports. American Journal of Public Health. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.87.1.103
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.