Employment, job strain, and preterm delivery among women in North Carolina
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVES: A population-based case-control study was conducted in central North Carolina to assess the relationship between occupational stress and preterm delivery. METHODS: Four hundred twenty-one women delivering infants before 37 weeks' gestation and 612 women delivering infants at term were interviewed a median of 6 months after delivery. Exposure information was collected for all jobs held for at least 1 month during pregnancy. RESULTS: Work in a "high strain" job (i.e., high demand and low control) was not associated with increased risk of preterm delivery compared with work in "low strain" jobs (all other combinations of job demand and control). Narrowing the exposure window to the third trimester did not modify the results. However, women who worked at a high-strain job full-time (odds ratio [OR] = 1.4, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.9, 2.0) or for 30 or more weeks (OR = 1.4, CI = 1.0, 2.2) had a modestly increased risk. Several analyses suggested that Black women were at greater risk from job strain than White women. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that chronic exposure during pregnancy to work characterized by high demand and low control may be modestly associated with preterm delivery.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 29 · Cited by 105
- Authors
- Brett, K. M., Strogatz, D. S., & Savitz, D. A.
- Affiliations
- National Center for Health Statistics (US)
- Venue
- American Journal of Public Health
- Publisher
- American Public Health Association
- Published
- 1997-02
- Volume
- 87
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 199-204
- ISSN
- 0090-0036 (ISSN-L)
- 1541-0048
- PMC
- PMC1380794
- OpenAlex
- W1976463980
- Cited by
- 105
- References
- 29
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 9.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- American Journal of Public Health (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) (submittedVersion)
- UNC Libraries
- Funders
- March of Dimes Foundation
- National Institutes of Health (5r29hd023862-05)
- U.S. Public Health Service (R48/CDR402177)
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD23862, HD238625)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Workplace Health and Well-being
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Safety in Workplaces
- Keywords
- job strain, preterm birth, occupational stress, job demands, job control, pregnancy, maternal employment, full-time employment, racial disparities, Black women, third trimester exposure, North Carolina
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Black or African American, Educational Status, Employment, Female, Humans, Obstetric Labor, Premature, North Carolina, Pregnancy, Stress, Psychological, Case-Control Studies, Workload, Marital Status, White People
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review