Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 481

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Brief Intervention for Heavy-Drinking College Students: 4-Year Follow-Up and Natural History

Open access
Baer, John S., Kivlahan, Daniel R., Blume, Arthur W., McKnight, Patrick, Marlatt, G. Alan·2001·American Journal of Public Health

Abstract

Objectives. This study examined long-term response to an individual preventive intervention for high-risk college drinkers relative to the natural history of college drinking. Methods. A single-session, individualized preventive intervention was evaluated within a randomized controlled trial with college freshmen who reported drinking heavily while in high school. An additional group randomly selected from the entire screening pool provided a normative comparison. Participant self-report was assessed annually for 4 years. Results. High-risk controls showed secular trends for reduced drinking quantity and negative consequences without changes in drinking frequency. Those receiving the brief preventive intervention reported significant additional reductions, particularly with respect to negative consequences. Categorical individual change analyses show that remission is normative, and they suggest that participants receiving the brief intervention are more likely to improve and less likely to worsen regarding negative drinking consequences. Conclusions. Brief individual preventive interventions for high-risk college drinkers can achieve long-term benefits even in the context of maturational trends.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2105/ajph.91.8.1310

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 34 references

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. 10.1037/0022-006X.66.4.604 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1037/0022-006X.68.3.500 · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.68.3.500
  3. 10.1037/0022-006X.53.2.189 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Shadish WR. Planned critical multiplism: some elaborations.Behav Assess.1986;8:75–103.
  5. 10.1037/0022-006X.60.6.974 · DOI

Cited by

See all 481

Metadata

Authors
Baer, J. S., Kivlahan, D. R., Blume, A. W., McKnight, P., & Marlatt, G. A.
Venue
American Journal of Public Health
Published
2001-08
Volume
91
Issue
8
Pages
1310-1316
ISSN
  • 0090-0036 (ISSN-L)
  • 1541-0048
OpenAlex
W2097624629
Cited by
481
References
34
FWCI
11.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Brief Intervention for Heavy-Drinking College Students: 4-Year Follow-Up and Natural History. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2105/ajph.91.8.1310
The paper
Baer, J. S., Kivlahan, D. R., Blume, A. W., McKnight, P., & Marlatt, G. A. (2001). Brief Intervention for Heavy-Drinking College Students: 4-Year Follow-Up and Natural History. American Journal of Public Health. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.91.8.1310

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.