Cited by 234Medical Coding and Health InformationRace, Genetics, and SocietyElectronic Health Records Systems

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Agreement Between Administrative Data and Patients’ Self-Reports of Race/Ethnicity

Open access
Kressin, Nancy R., Chang, Bei-Hung, Hendricks, Ann, Kazis, Lewis E.·2003·American Journal of Public Health

Abstract

Objectives. We examined agreement of administrative data with self-reported race/ethnicity and identified correlates of agreement. Methods. We used Veterans Affairs administrative data and VA 1999 Large Health survey race/ethnicity data. Results. Relatively low rates of agreement (approximately 60%) between data sources were largely the result of administrative data from patients whose race/ethnicity was unknown, with least agreement for Native American, Asian, and Pacific Islander patients. After exclusion of patients with missing race/ethnicity, agreement improved except for Native Americans. Agreement did not increase substantially after inclusion of data from individuals indicating multiple race/ethnicities. Patients for whom there was better agreement between data sources tended to be less educated, non–solitary living, younger, and White; to have sufficient food; and to use more inpatient Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) care. Conclusions. Better reporting of race/ethnicity data will improve agreement between data sources. Previous studies using VA administrative data may have underestimated racial disparities.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2105/ajph.93.10.1734

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. 10.2105/AJPH.84.6.1018 · DOI
  2. Baumeister L, Marchi K, Pearl M, Williams R, Braveman P. The validity of information of “race” and “Hispanic ethnicity” in California birth certificate data. Health Serv Res. 2000;35:869–883.
  3. 10.1001/jama.1992.03480020069033 · DOI
  4. 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1999.tb01599.x · DOI
  5. 10.2105/AJPH.92.9.1471 · DOI
  6. 10.1056/NEJM199308263290907 · DOI
  7. 10.1001/jama.1994.03510390045028 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/0735-1097(94)90112-0 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/S0735-1097(97)00034-X · DOI
  10. 10.1016/S0002-8703(99)70227-9 · DOI
  11. 10.1097/00005650-199809000-00005 · DOI
  12. 10.1097/00005650-199501001-00005 · DOI
  13. 10.1097/00005650-198512000-00005 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 209

Metadata

Authors
Kressin, N. R., Chang, B.-H., Hendricks, A., & Kazis, L. E.
Affiliations
Boston University (US)
Venue
American Journal of Public Health
Published
2003-10
Volume
93
Issue
10
Pages
1734-1739
ISSN
  • 0090-0036 (ISSN-L)
  • 1541-0048
OpenAlex
W2145841259
Cited by
234
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 11
FWCI
30.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Public Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Medical Coding and Health Information
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Race, Genetics, and Society
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
Keywords
race and ethnicity, self-report, administrative data, data source agreement, veterans, racial disparities, Native Americans, sociodemographic correlates
MeSH terms
Demography, Ethnicity, Health Services Research, Hospitals, Veterans, Humans, Patients, Self Concept, Socioeconomic Factors, United States, United States Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans, Reproducibility of Results, Databases, Factual, Public Health Informatics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review