An approach to studying social disparities in health and health care
Open accessAbstract
Objective. We explored methods and potential applications of a systematic approach to studying and monitoring social disparities in health and health care. Methods. Using delayed or no prenatal care as an example indicator, we (1) categorized women into groups with different levels of underlying social advantage; (2) described and graphically displayed rates of the indicator and relative group size for each social group; (3) identified and measured disparities, calculating relative risks and rate differences to compare each group with its a priori most-advantaged counterpart; (4) examined changes in rates and disparities over time; and (5) conducted multivariate analyses for the overall sample and “at-risk” groups to identify particular factors warranting attention. Results. We identified at-risk groups and relevant factors and suggest ways to direct efforts for reducing prenatal care disparities. Conclusions. This systematic approach should be useful for studying and monitoring disparities in other indicators of health and health care.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Area-level poverty rates have been used as an indicator for other social determinants of health and barriers to stable health care access.
“Area-level poverty rates have been used as an indicator for other social determinants of health and barriers to stable health care access.4”
From Randomized, wait-list–controlled pilot study of app-delivered mindfulness for patients reporting chronic pain (2021) · cites this paper as [4]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 97 · Cited by 100
- Authors
- Braveman, P. A., Egerter, S. A., Cubbin, C., & Marchi, K. S.
- Affiliations
- University of California, San Francisco (US)
- Venue
- American Journal of Public Health
- Publisher
- American Public Health Association
- Published
- 2004-12
- Volume
- 94
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2139-2148
- ISSN
- 0090-0036 (ISSN-L)
- 1541-0048
- OpenAlex
- W2170183224
- Cited by
- 100
- References
- 97
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 6.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- American Journal of Public Health (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- University Libraries (University of Maryland) (submittedVersion)
- DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
- Digital Repository at the University of Maryland (University of Maryland College Park)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
- Social Sciences › Health › Public Health and Social Inequalities
- Keywords
- health care disparities, social deprivation, relative risk, rate difference, vulnerable populations
- MeSH terms
- California, Cross-Sectional Studies, Ethnicity, Female, Health Services Research, Humans, Pregnancy, Prenatal Care, Quality of Health Care, Socioeconomic Factors, Racial Groups
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review