The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Assessing the Long-Term Effects of the Safe Dates Program and a Booster in Preventing and Reducing Adolescent Dating Violence Victimization and Perpetration
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVES: This study determined 4-year postintervention effects of Safe Dates on dating violence, booster effects, and moderators of the program effects. METHODS: We gathered baseline data in 10 schools that were randomly allocated to a treatment condition. We collected follow-up data 1 month after the program and then yearly thereafter for 4 years. Between the 2- and 3-year follow-ups, a randomly selected half of treatment adolescents received a booster. RESULTS: Compared with controls, adolescents receiving Safe Dates reported significantly less physical, serious physical, and sexual dating violence perpetration and victimization 4 years after the program. The booster did not improve the effectiveness of Safe Dates. CONCLUSIONS: Safe Dates shows promise for preventing dating violence but the booster should not be used.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The Health Education modules were adapted from the evaluated intervention ‘Safe Dates’ which has been shown to be successful at reducing intimate partner violence among adolescents in the United States (Foshee et al., 2004).”
From Safe schools for teens: Preventing sexual abuse of urban poor teens, proof-of-concept study-improving teachers'and students'knowledge, skills and attitudes (2020) · cites this paper as Foshee et al., 2004
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Silverman, J. G. (2001) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.286.5.572 · Cited by 1,239
An evaluation of Safe Dates, an adolescent dating violence prevention program
Foshee, V. A., Bauman, K. E., Arriaga, X. B., Helms, R. W., Koch, G. G., & Linder, G. F. (1998) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.88.1.45 · Cited by 633
Self-citationGender differences in adolescent dating abuse prevalence, types and injuries
Foshee, V. A. (1996) · Health Education Research · doi:10.1093/her/11.3.275-a · Cited by 484
Community and dating violence among adolescents: Perpetration and victimization
MALIK, S., Sorenson, S. B., & Aneshensel, C. S. (1997) · Journal of Adolescent Health · doi:10.1016/s1054-139x(97)00143-2 · Cited by 483
The Safe Dates Project: theoretical basis, evaluation design, and selected baseline findings
Foshee, V. A., Fletcher Linder, G., Bauman, K. E., Langwick, S. A., Arriaga, X. B., Heath, J. L., McMahon, P. M., & Bangdiwala, S. (1996) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0749-3797(18)30235-6 · Cited by 478 · cited 8×
“For details on program development, content, and theoretical base, see the 1996 report by Foshee et al.(27) Follow-up data were collected from treatment and control adolescents at 1 month (wave 2) and 1 year (wave 3) after Safe Dates was completed.”
MethodInfluentialHalpern, C. T., Oslak, S. G., Young, M. L., Martin, S. L., & Kupper, L. L. (2001) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.91.10.1679 · Cited by 478
Predictors of Dating Violence Among High School Students
O’Keefe, M. (1997) · Journal of Interpersonal Violence · doi:10.1177/088626097012004005 · Cited by 475
Spousal Homicide Risk and Estrangement
Wilson, M., & Daly, M. (1993) · Violence and Victims · doi:10.1891/0886-6708.8.1.3 · Cited by 470
Drug Prevention in Junior High: A Multi-Site Longitudinal Test
Ellickson, P. L., & Bell, R. M. (1990) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.2180065 · Cited by 429
Gender Differences in the Longitudinal Predictors of Adolescent Dating Violence
Foshee, V. A., Linder, F., MacDougall, J. E., & Bangdiwala, S. I. (2001) · Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1006/pmed.2000.0793 · Cited by 421
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Durlak, J. A., Weissberg, R. P., Dymnicki, A. B., Taylor, R. D., & Schellinger, K. B. (2011) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01564.x · Cited by 10,854
Prevention of violence against women and girls: what does the evidence say?
Ellsberg, M., Arango, D., Morton, M., Gennari, F., Kiplesund, S., Contreras, M., & Watts, C. (2015) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(14)61703-7 · Cited by 761
Three Decades of Research: The Case for Comprehensive Sex Education
Goldfarb, E. S., & Lieberman, L. D. (2021) · Journal of Adolescent Health · doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2020.07.036 · Cited by 840
A systematic review of primary prevention strategies for sexual violence perpetration
DeGue, S. A., Valle, L. A., Holt, M. K., Massetti, G. M., Matjasko, J. L., & Tharp, A. T. (2014) · Aggression and Violent Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.avb.2014.05.004 · Cited by 781
Jewkes, R. K., Nduna, M., Levin, J. B., Jama, N., Dunkle, K., Puren, A. J., & Duvvury, N. (2008) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.a506 · Cited by 747
Metadata
- Authors
- Foshee, V. A., Bauman, K. E., Ennett, S. T., Linder, G. F., Benefield, T., & Suchindran, C.
- Affiliations
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
- Venue
- American Journal of Public Health
- Publisher
- American Public Health Association
- Published
- 2004-04
- Volume
- 94
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 619-624
- ISSN
- 0090-0036 (ISSN-L)
- 1541-0048
- PMC
- PMC1448308
- OpenAlex
- W1984407050
- Cited by
- 522
- References
- 34
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 40 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 34 · 2014: 49 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 20
- FWCI
- 11.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- American Journal of Public Health (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (U81/CCU409964)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
- Keywords
- dating violence, dating violence perpetration, dating violence victimization, booster intervention, long-term program effects, school-based intervention, sexual violence, physical violence
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Psychology, Adolescent, Courtship, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Health Education, Humans, Male, North Carolina, Periodicals as Topic, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Rural Health, School Health Services, Violence, Program Evaluation, Linear Models, Adolescent Health Services, Safety Management, Crime Victims
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
