The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Project D.A.R.E. Outcome Effectiveness Revisited
Open accessAbstract
Objectives. We provide an updated meta-analysis on the effectiveness of Project D.A.R.E. in preventing alcohol, tobacco, and illicit drug use among school-aged youths. Methods. We used meta-analytic techniques to create an overall effect size for D.A.R.E. outcome evaluations reported in scientific journals. Results. The overall weighted effect size for the included D.A.R.E. studies was extremely small (correlation coefficient = 0.011; Cohen d = 0.023; 95% confidence interval = −0.04, 0.08) and nonsignificant (z = 0.73, NS). Conclusions. Our study supports previous findings indicating that D.A.R.E. is ineffective.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ennett, S. T., Tobler, N. S., Ringwalt, C. L., & Flewelling, R. L. (1994) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.84.9.1394 · Cited by 655
Cited by
Suleiman, A. B., & Dahl, R. E. (2017) · Journal of Adolescent Health · doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2016.12.010 · Cited by 95
Understanding mis-implementation in Public Health practice
Brownson, R. C., Allen, P., Jacob, R. R., Harris, J. K., Duggan, K., Hipp, P. R., & Erwin, P. C. (2015) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2014.11.015 · Cited by 70
Metadata
- Authors
- West, S. L., & O’Neal, K. K.
- Venue
- American Journal of Public Health
- Publisher
- American Public Health Association
- Published
- 2004-06
- Volume
- 94
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1027-1029
- ISSN
- 0090-0036 (ISSN-L)
- 1541-0048
- OpenAlex
- W2159664898
- Cited by
- 353
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
