The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Epidemiology of Fractures of the Forearm: A Biomechanical Investigation of Bone Strength
Abstract
1. In an urban population of 209,473, the age-and-sex-specific rate of inicidence of 2,672 fractures of the forearm that occurred during a five-year period were determined. The fractures were classified as to location (distal, shaft, or proximal), degree of trauma (moderate or severe), and displacement (reduced or not reduced). 2. It was found that before the age of forty the incidence of fracture in the distal end of the forearm was about equal in males and females. Above the age of sixty these fractures in women outnumbered those in men by a factor of more than seven. This dramatic rise in the incidence of fracture in the female was associated with progressively less severe trauma and more displacement of the fractures. In males, on the other hand, relatively more severe trauma was found to cause relatively less displacement of the fractures. In females the ratio of metaphyseal to shaft fractures rose from three in children to seventy-two in the aged, whereas in males this ratio changed relatively little. 3. The findings are interpreted as indicatimig that progressive fragility of the skeleton is a major cause of fracture in middle-aged and aged women. This fragility involves spongy bone more than cortical bone. It develops at a later age and is less severe in men. 4. As compared with other criteria for evaluation of age changes in bone, the fracture incidence in a closed population is the most revealing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Rizzoli, R., Bianchi, M. L., Garabédian, M., McKay, H. A., & Moreno, L. A. (2010) · Bone · doi:10.1016/j.bone.2009.10.005 · Cited by 643
Landin, L. A. (1983) · Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica · doi:10.3109/17453678309155630 · Cited by 585
Bonjour, J. P., Theintz, G., Law, F., Slosman, D., & Rizzoli, R. (1994) · Osteoporosis International · doi:10.1007/bf01623429 · Cited by 340
Subperiosteal Expansion and Cortical Remodeling of the Human Femur and Tibia with Aging
Ruff, C. B., & Hayes, W. C. (1982) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7112107 · Cited by 318
Alffram, P.-A. (1964) · Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica · doi:10.3109/ort.1964.35.suppl-65.01 · Cited by 317
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Alffram, P.-A., & Bauer, G. C. H.
- Venue
- The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery
- Published
- 1962-01
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 105-114
- ISSN
- 0021-9355 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2408587183
- Cited by
- 336
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Epidemiology of Fractures of the Forearm: A Biomechanical Investigation of Bone Strength. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2106/00004623-196244010-00009
- The paper
- Alffram, P.-A., & Bauer, G. C. H. (1962). Epidemiology of Fractures of the Forearm: A Biomechanical Investigation of Bone Strength. The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-196244010-00009
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.