Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 503

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

In Vivo Measurements of Intradiscal Pressure: DISCOMETRY, A METHOD FOR THE DETERMINATION OF PRESSURE IN THE LOWER LUMBAR DISCS

NACHEMSON, ALF, MORRIS, JAMES M.·1964·The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery

Abstract

In an effort to obtain more information about the mechanics of the lumbar discs and about the production of low-back pain, direct in vivo measurements of lumbar intradiscal pressures were made under various conditions. A needle with a pressure-sensitive polyethylene membrane at its tip was constructed for this purpose. Pressure values were obtained in eighteen normal third and fourth lumbar discs of sixteen subjects. The sitting position was used in all cases; other positions and factors studied included standing, reclining, holding total weights of 9.1 and 22.7 kilograms, performing the Valsalva maneuver, and wearing an inflatable corset. High intradiscal pressures (ten to fifteen kilograms per square centimeter) were found in the normal discs with the subject in the sitting position. In all cases, pressures were highest in the sitting position, about 30 per cent less in the standing position, and about 50 per cent less in the reclining than in the sitting position. It was found that the lower lumbar discs have to support total loads of as much as 100 to 175 kilograms when the subject is seated. For the standing position total loads of between ninety and 120 kilograms were calculated from the pressure values obtained. It was calculated that, in the normal discs tensile forces of considerable magnitude (sixty to eighty kilograms per square centimeter) exist in the posterior part of the annulus; this fact gives strong support to the mechanical theory of the production of ruptures of the posterior annulus. The Valsalva maneuver generally increased the intradiscal pressure, but the results were variable. The inflatable corset decreased the pressure in the examined discs by about 25 per cent. The loads on discs spanned by a posterior fusion in two patients were approximately 30 per cent less than would have been anticipated. In the one with a pseudarthrosis, further loading increased the intradiscal pressure to a value similar to that in subjects without fusion. In the one with a successful fusion demonstrated by surgical exploration, the force on the disc was proportionately reduced with further loading. The data support and help to explain such observations as increased pain in sitting as compared with standing and reclining in patients with low-back pain, pain during the Valsalva maneuver, and the codfish appearance of osteoporotic spines with relatively normal discs. Lumbar discometry is suggested as a means not only of determining the basic mechanics of the disc in different positions and under different conditions of stress but also of evaluating therapeutic measures such as posterior fusion and the wearing of corsets and braces.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2106/00004623-196446050-00012

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 503

Metadata

Authors
NACHEMSON, A., & MORRIS, J. M.
Venue
The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery
Published
1964-07
Volume
46
Issue
5
Pages
1077-1092
ISSN
0021-9355 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4320288186
Cited by
503
References
0
FWCI
6.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: In Vivo Measurements of Intradiscal Pressure: DISCOMETRY, A METHOD FOR THE DETERMINATION OF PRESSURE IN THE LOWER LUMBAR DISCS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2106/00004623-196446050-00012
The paper
NACHEMSON, A., & MORRIS, J. M. (1964). In Vivo Measurements of Intradiscal Pressure: DISCOMETRY, A METHOD FOR THE DETERMINATION OF PRESSURE IN THE LOWER LUMBAR DISCS. The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-196446050-00012

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.