Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 318

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Aggressive granulomatous lesions associated with hip arthroplasty. Immunopathological studies.

Santavirta, S, Konttinen, Y T, Bergroth, V, Eskola, A, Tallroth, K, Lindholm, T S·1990·The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery

Abstract

The local immunopathological response was analyzed in six patients who had a revision of a total hip prosthesis because of an aggressive granulomatous lesion and in six patients who had a revision because of common loosening of the prosthetic stem. All twelve patients had had a total replacement arthroplasty for primary osteoarthrosis. All of the prostheses had been cemented. The aggressive granulomas consisted of well organized connective tissue containing histiocytic-monocytic and fibroblastic reactive zones. The granulomas were highly vascularized, and villous structures were observed at many sites. In contrast, the areas around the loose cemented stems were characterized by dense connective tissue. Immunohistological evaluation revealed that most of the cells in the aggressive granulomatous tissue were multinucleated giant cells and C3bi-receptor and nonspecific esterase-positive monocyte-macrophages. This cytological finding suggests a foreign-body-type reaction, compatible with the rapidly progressive lytic nature of the lesion that was shown radiographically. There was a clear-cut difference between aggressive granulomatosis and the more common lesion accompanying prosthetic loosening--namely, the relative lack of activated fibroblasts in granulomatosis. We suggest that granulomatosis involves an uncoupling of the normal sequence of monocyte-macrophage-mediated clearance of foreign material and tissue debris that is normally followed by fibroblast-mediated synthesis and remodeling of the extracellular matrix. We also suggest that aggressive granulomatosis in association with a cemented hip prosthesis is a distinct entity, not only clinically and radiographically, but also histopathologically.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2106/00004623-199072020-00014

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Santavirta, S., Konttinen, Y. T., Bergroth, V, Eskola, A., Tallroth, K., & Lindholm, T. S.
Venue
The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery
Published
1990-02
Volume
72
Issue
2
Pages
252-258
ISSN
0021-9355 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2268968056
Cited by
318
References
0
FWCI
13.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.