The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Abnormal findings on magnetic resonance images of asymptomatic shoulders.
Abstract
Magnetic resonance images of the shoulders of ninety-six asymptomatic individuals were evaluated to determine the prevalence of findings consistent with a tear of the rotator cuff. The scans were reviewed independently by two diagnostic radiologists who are experienced in the interpretation of magnetic resonance images of the shoulder. The over-all prevalence of tears of the rotator cuff in all age-groups was 34 per cent (thirty-three). There were fourteen full-thickness tears (15 per cent) and nineteen partial-thickness tears (20 per cent). The frequency of full-thickness and partial-thickness tears increased significantly with age (p < 0.001 and 0.05, respectively). Twenty-five (54 per cent) of the forty-six individuals who were more than sixty years old had a tear of the rotator cuff: thirteen (28 per cent) had a full-thickness tear and twelve (26 per cent) had a partial-thickness tear. Of the twenty-five individuals who were forty to sixty years old, one (4 per cent) had a full-thickness tear and six (24 per cent) had a partial-thickness tear. Of the twenty-five individuals who were nineteen to thirty-nine years old, none had a full-thickness tear and one (4 per cent) had a partial-thickness tear. Magnetic resonance imaging identified a high prevalence of tears of the rotator cuff in asymptomatic individuals. These tears were increasingly frequent with advancing age and were compatible with normal, painless, functional activity. The results of the present study emphasize the potential hazards of the use of magnetic resonance imaging scans alone as a basis for the determination of operative intervention in the absence of associated clinical findings.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Rotator cuff related shoulder pain: Assessment, management and uncertainties
Lewis, J. (2016) · Manual Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.math.2016.03.009 · Cited by 378
Pathology of the torn rotator cuff tendon: REDUCTION IN POTENTIAL FOR REPAIR AS TEAR SIZE INCREASES
Matthews, T. J. W., Hand, G. C., Rees, J. L., Athanasou, N. A., & Carr, A. J. (2006) · The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume · doi:10.1302/0301-620x.88b4.16845 · Cited by 331
Dunn, W. R., Kuhn, J. E., Sanders, R., An, Q., Baumgarten, K. M., Bishop, J. Y., Brophy, R. H., Carey, J. L., Holloway, G. B., Jones, G. L., et al. (2014) · Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery · doi:10.2106/jbjs.l.01304 · Cited by 226
Kukkonen, J., Joukainen, A., Lehtinen, J., Mattila, K. T., Tuominen, E. K. J., Kauko, T., & Äärimaa, V. (2014) · The Bone & Joint Journal · doi:10.1302/0301-620x.96b1.32168 · Cited by 172
Ultrasound of the shoulder: asymptomatic findings in men
Girish, G., Lobo, L. G., Jacobson, J. A., Morag, Y., Miller, B., & Jamadar, D. A. (2011) · American Journal of Roentgenology · doi:10.2214/ajr.11.6971 · Cited by 170
Metadata
- Authors
- Sher, J. S., Uribe, J. W., Posada, A., Murphy, B. J., & Zlatkin, M. B.
- Venue
- The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery
- Published
- 1995-01
- Volume
- 77
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 10-15
- ISSN
- 0021-9355 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W183527674
- Cited by
- 1,139
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Abnormal findings on magnetic resonance images of asymptomatic shoulders. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2106/00004623-199501000-00002
- The paper
- Sher, J. S., Uribe, J. W., Posada, A., Murphy, B. J., & Zlatkin, M. B. (1995). Abnormal findings on magnetic resonance images of asymptomatic shoulders. The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-199501000-00002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.