The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Arthroscopic Drilling for the Treatment of Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus*
Abstract
BACKGROUND: An osteochondral lesion of the talus is a relatively rare disorder of the ankle. While a number of treatment options have been reported, it appears to be difficult to manage all lesions with a single approach. We evaluated the indications for and the results of arthroscopic drilling for the treatment of an osteochondral lesion of the talus. METHODS: Eighteen ankles (seventeen patients) with a symptomatic osteochondral lesion of the talus were examined. The ages of the patients ranged from ten to seventy-eight years (mean, 28.0 years) at the time of the operation, and the patients were followed postoperatively for two to 9.5 years (mean, 4.6 years). After the continuity of the cartilage overlying the lesion and the stability of the lesion had been confirmed, arthroscopic drilling was performed with use of a Kirschner wire that was 1.0 to 1.2 millimeters in diameter. A cast was not applied postoperatively, and full weight-bearing was allowed six weeks after the procedure. RESULTS: The clinical result was good for thirteen ankles and fair for five; all ankles had improvement. Twelve of the thirteen ankles that were in patients who were less than thirty years old had a good result. In contrast, only one of the five ankles in patients who were fifty years old or more had a good result. Thus, the clinical results tended to be better for younger patients. Improvement was seen radiographically in fifteen ankles. However, the three ankles in patients who were more than sixty years old were found to have no improvement on radiographic examination. Analysis of the group of patients who had a history of trauma revealed that the mean interval between the injury and the operation was 6.3 months for the three ankles that had a good radiographic result and 11.3 months for the six that had a fair result. Thus, the radiographic results tended to be better when the interval between the injury and the operation was shorter. CONCLUSIONS: Arthroscopic drilling for the treatment of medial osteochondral lesions of the talus does not require osteotomy of the medial malleolus or postoperative immobilization; thus, the procedure is less invasive than other types of operative treatment for the condition and it allows early resumption of daily activities and sports. On the basis of the results in this study, we believe that the procedure is effective and useful in young patients, especially those who have not yet had closure of the epiphyseal plate. A specific indication for the procedure is an early lesion with only mild osteosclerosis of the surrounding talar bone, continuity of the cartilaginous surface, and stability of the osteochondral fragment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Post‐traumatic osteoarthritis: The role of accelerated chondrocyte senescence
Martin, J. A., Brown, T., Heiner, A., & Buckwalter, J. A. (2004) · Biorheology: The Official Journal of the International Society of Biorheology · doi:10.1177/0006355x2004041003004017 · Cited by 168
Metadata
- Authors
- KUMAI, T., TAKAKURA, Y., HIGASHIYAMA, I., & TAMAI, S.
- Venue
- The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery
- Published
- 1999-09
- Volume
- 81
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1229-35
- ISSN
- 0021-9355 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2164870722
- Cited by
- 282
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Arthroscopic Drilling for the Treatment of Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus*. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2106/00004623-199909000-00004
- The paper
- KUMAI, T., TAKAKURA, Y., HIGASHIYAMA, I., & TAMAI, S. (1999). Arthroscopic Drilling for the Treatment of Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus*. The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-199909000-00004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.