Cited by 684Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationPsychometric Methodologies and TestingTotal Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes

The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Outcomes Instruments: Normative Values from the General Population

Hunsaker, Frank G., Cioffi, Dominic A., Amadio, Peter C., Wright, James G., Caughlin, Beth·2002·The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The collection of population-based normative data is a necessary step in the process of standardization of eleven American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) musculoskeletal outcomes measures. These data serve as comparative normative scores with which to assess the effectiveness of treatment regimens in clinical practice settings and to study the clinical outcomes of treatment in musculoskeletal research. METHODS: With use of a panel mail methodology, self-reported data on the eleven AAOS musculoskeletal outcomes measures were collected from the general population of the United States. RESULTS: The overall response rate of 67.4% for the various surveys met study expectations. For the eleven measures, the range of the confidence intervals for the surveys was +/-1.6% to +/-2.3%, exceeding the +/-3% set a priori. With use of the Multitrait/Multi-Item Analysis Program, all of the scales within each of eleven measures exhibited high internal reliability as well as discriminant and convergent validity. Items within each of the scales contributed roughly equal proportions of information to the total scale scores. CONCLUSIONS: All eleven instruments met study expectations for providing reliable and valid normative data for use in clinical and research settings.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2106/00004623-200202000-00007

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 17 · Cited by 684

Authors
Hunsaker, F. G., Cioffi, D. A., Amadio, P. C., Wright, J. G., & Caughlin, B.
Affiliations
Mayo Clinic (US)
Venue
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume
Published
2002-02
Volume
84
Issue
2
Pages
208-215
ISSN
0021-9355 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2125301687
Cited by
684
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 45 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 47 · 2016: 43 · 2015: 37 · 2014: 46 · 2013: 48 · 2012: 34
FWCI
7.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
Keywords
reference values, self-reported outcome measures, internal consistency, discriminant validity, convergent validity, scale reliability
MeSH terms
Data Collection, Humans, Orthopedics, Reference Values, Societies, Medical, United States, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Orthopedic Procedures

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review