The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Platelet-Rich Plasma Differs According to Preparation Method and Human Variability
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Varying concentrations of blood components in platelet-rich plasma preparations may contribute to the variable results seen in recently published clinical studies. The purposes of this investigation were (1) to quantify the level of platelets, growth factors, red blood cells, and white blood cells in so-called one-step (clinically used commercial devices) and two-step separation systems and (2) to determine the influence of three separate blood draws on the resulting components of platelet-rich plasma. METHODS: Three different platelet-rich plasma (PRP) separation methods (on blood samples from eight subjects with a mean age [and standard deviation] of 31.6 ± 10.9 years) were used: two single-spin processes (PRPLP and PRPHP) and a double-spin process (PRPDS) were evaluated for concentrations of platelets, red and white blood cells, and growth factors. Additionally, the effect of three repetitive blood draws on platelet-rich plasma components was evaluated. RESULTS: The content and concentrations of platelets, white blood cells, and growth factors for each method of separation differed significantly. All separation techniques resulted in a significant increase in platelet concentration compared with native blood. Platelet and white blood-cell concentrations of the PRPHP procedure were significantly higher than platelet and white blood-cell concentrations produced by the so-called single-step PRPLP and the so-called two-step PRPDS procedures, although significant differences between PRPLP and PRPDS were not observed. Comparing the results of the three blood draws with regard to the reliability of platelet number and cell counts, wide variations of intra-individual numbers were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Single-step procedures are capable of producing sufficient amounts of platelets for clinical usage. Within the evaluated procedures, platelet numbers and numbers of white blood cells differ significantly. The intra-individual results of platelet-rich plasma separations showed wide variations in platelet and cell numbers as well as levels of growth factors regardless of separation method.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Yan, R., Gu, Y., Ran, J., Hu, Y., Zheng, Z., Zeng, M., Heng, B. C., Chen, X., Yin, Z., Chen, W., et al. (2017) · The American Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1177/0363546517694357 · Cited by 124
Platelet-Rich Plasma: Review of Current Literature on its Use for Tendon and Ligament Pathology
Kia, C., Baldino, J., Bell, R., Ramji, A., Uyeki, C., & Mazzocca, A. (2018) · Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine · doi:10.1007/s12178-018-9515-y · Cited by 94
Self-citationMontalvan, B., Le Goux, P., Klouche, S., Borgel, D., Hardy, P., & Breban, M. (2016) · Rheumatology · doi:10.1093/rheumatology/kev326 · Cited by 92
Yoshida, R., Cheng, M., & Murray, M. M. (2014) · Journal of Orthopaedic Research · doi:10.1002/jor.22493 · Cited by 67
The role of platelet-rich plasma in biomedicine: A comprehensive overview
Zhang, Z., Liu, P., Xue, X., Zhang, Z., Wang, L., Jiang, Y., Zhang, C., Zhou, H., Lv, S., Shen, W., et al. (2025) · iScience · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2024.111705 · Cited by 48
Platelet-rich plasma did not improve early healing of medial collateral ligament in rats
Amar, E., Snir, N., Sher, O., Brosh, T., Khashan, M., Salai, M., & Dolkart, O. (2015) · Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery · doi:10.1007/s00402-015-2306-7 · Cited by 14
Krismer, A. M., Cabra, R. S., May, R. D., Frauchiger, D. A., Kohl, S., Ahmad, S. S., & Gantenbein, B. (2017) · Journal of Orthopaedic Research · doi:10.1002/jor.23599 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Mazzocca, A. D., McCarthy, M. B. R., Chowaniec, D. M., Cote, M. P., Romeo, A. A., Bradley, J. P., Arciero, R. A., & Beitzel, K.
- Venue
- Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery
- Published
- 2012-02-15
- Volume
- 94
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 308-316
- ISSN
- 0021-9355 (ISSN-L)
- 1535-1386
- OpenAlex
- W2168945706
- Cited by
- 508
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 40.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.