The DOI matches its Crossref record; its reference list is not available.
Navigating Ethics in AI-Driven Translation for a Human-Centric Future
Open accessAbstract
General Background: The rapid growth of AI technology is reshaping various industries, including translation, bringing both opportunities and ethical challenges. Specific Background: AI's integration into translation processes promises automation and efficiency but raises concerns about the role of human translators, translation quality, and cultural nuances. Additionally, issues like machine bias and privacy preservation are emerging as critical ethical considerations. Knowledge Gap: While much attention has been given to AI's technical advancements, there is a lack of comprehensive research addressing the ethical implications of AI in translation and its impact on professional roles and requirements. Aims: This study aims to critically review the literature on AI's impact on the translation profession and explore the ethical challenges arising from AI integration. It seeks to provide recommendations for ethical translation practices in an AI-enhanced environment. Results: Through in-depth interviews with professional translators, educators, and industry experts, the study identified key themes such as transparency in AI systems, the responsibility of human translators, bias in AI systems, and the impact on human translators. Novelty: This research offers a unique perspective by combining insights from diverse stakeholders and emphasizing ethical considerations in AI-assisted translation. It proposes an action-oriented approach to addressing ethical concerns to ensure the survival of the translation profession in an AI-driven society. Implications: The findings serve as valuable guidance for translators, educators, and policymakers, highlighting the need for ethical frameworks and guidelines specific to AI integration in translation. This study underscores the importance of balancing AI advancements with ethical standards to achieve high-quality, culturally sensitive translations. Highlight: Ethical Considerations: Address bias and privacy in AI-assisted translation. Human Expertise: Maintain human involvement for quality and cultural nuance. Future Research: Enhance ethical practices with diverse, comprehensive studies. Keyword: AI integration, translation ethics, machine bias, human translators, cultural sensitivity
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Bias also arises in feature selection and model objectives: if a marketing algorithm is optimized purely for engagement or conversion, it might exploit whatever correlations exist in data, including those that coincide with sensitive attributes (Mbah, 2024;Mutashar, 2024;Oguntibeju, 2024;Qwaider et al., 2024).”
From Surveillance Capitalism, Consumer Subjectivity and Marketing in the Age of Artificial Intelligence (2025) · cites this paper as Mutashar, 2024
Citations
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 1 · Cited by 13
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- V. Braun and V. Clarke, "One Size Fits All? What Counts as Quality Practice in (Reflexive) Thematic Analysis," Qualitative Research in Psychology, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 328-352, 2020. · DOI · Paper page
- M. A. Domingo, "Ethical Considerations in Machine Translation," Language and Linguistics Compass, vol. 14, no. 12, pp. 1-15, 2020.
- J. Gonzalez-Rubio and H. Calvo, "The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on the Translation Profession," Perspectives: Studies in Translatology, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 278-294, 2021.
- D. Kenny, "Translation and Artificial Intelligence: The Future of the Profession," Translation Studies, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 412-429, 2022.
- M. O'Hagan, "Ethical Challenges for Translators in an Era of Artificial Intelligence," Translation Spaces, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 253-272, 2020.
- D. Rozado and P. Alsinet, "Machine Translation and Translation Ethics: A Critical Examination," Translation and Interpreting Studies, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 78-95, 2023.
Metadata
- Authors
- Mutashar, M. K.
- Affiliations
- University of Basrah (IQ)
- Corresponding author
- Mutashar, Mohammed Kadhim
- Venue
- Academia Open
- Publisher
- Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo
- Published
- 2024-08-07
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 2
- ISSN
- 2714-7444 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4401892546
- Cited by
- 13
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 2
- FWCI
- 12.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- Academia Open (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Translation Studies and Practices
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
- Keywords
- AI-assisted translation, translation ethics, human translators, cultural sensitivity, translation quality, privacy, human-AI collaboration, AI ethics guidelines
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Navigating Ethics in AI-Driven Translation for a Human-Centric Future. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.21070/acopen.9.2024.9407
- The paper
- Mutashar, M. K. (2024). Navigating Ethics in AI-Driven Translation for a Human-Centric Future. Academia Open. https://doi.org/10.21070/acopen.9.2024.9407