Cited by 13Digital Accessibility for DisabilitiesSubtitles and Audiovisual MediaDisability Rights and Representation

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Let's put standardisation in practice: accessibility services and interaction

Open access

Abstract

There are many international standardisation agencies working actively on producing technical requirements towards accessibility, both for physical environments and for media. Technology is developing at a fast pace to produce new interactions, which turn into new communication barriers: some avoidable. Taking into consideration accessibility standards from the design and requirement definition --the concept of “born accessible”-- would help towards native accessible technology. This article looks at existing standards related to accessibility and media communication. The first part of the article will revise the importance of drafting harmonised standards for accessibility in four main agencies producing accessibility standards: IEC, ITU, ISO and W3C. It will then outline how standards are produced and implemented at a European level by the European Standardisation Organisations (CEN, CENELEC and ETSI). The second part of the article will be organised by media accessibility services: subtitling, audio description, audio subtitling and sign language. Mention to easy to read as a new emerging accessibility modality, will also be made. The final part of the article will provide conclusions and directions for further research. Keywords: Media Accessibility, Standards, Accessibility services, Subtitling, Audio description, Audio subtitling, Easy to Read.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.21071/hikma.v20i1.12886

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. Ellis, Gerry (2016). Impairment and Disability: Challenging Concepts of "Normality". In: A. Matamala and P. Orero (Eds.), Researching Audio Description. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 35-45.
  2. ITU-T (2019). FSTP-ACC-RCS Overview of remote captioning services. Retrieved from: https://www.itu.int/pub/T-TUT-FSTP-2019- ACC.RCS/es -(2016). FSTP-UMAA -Use cases for assisting persons with disabilities using mobile applications. Retrieved from: https://www.itu.int/pub/T- TUT-FSTP-2016-UMAA/es -(2015). FSTP-AM -Guidelines for accessible meetings. Retrieved from: https://www.itu.int/es/publications/ITU- T/pages/publications.aspx?parent=T-TUT-FSTP-2015- AM&media=electronic -(2015). FSTP-ACC-RemPart -Guidelines for supporting remote participation in meetings for all. Retrieved from: https://www.itu.int/dms_pub/itu-t/opb/tut/T-TUT-FSTP-2015-ACC- PDF-E.pdf -(2006). FSTP-TACL -Telecommunications Accessibility Checklist. Retrieved from: https://www.itu.int/en/publications/Pages/publications.aspx?lang=en& media=electronic&parent=T-TUT-FSTP-2006-TACL
  3. ITU-T (2016). Use cases for assisting persons with disabilities using mobile applications. Geneva, Switzerland: ITU. Retrieved from: Hikma 20 (1) (2021), 71 -90 https://www.itu.int/dms_pub/itu-t/opb/tut/T-TUT-FSTP-2016-UMAA- PDF-E.pdf -(2015). Guidelines for supporting remote participation in meetings for all. Geneva, Switzerland: ITU. Retrieved from: https://www.itu.int/dms_pub/itu-t/opb/tut/T-TUT-FSTP-2015-ACC- PDF-E.pdf -(2006). FSTP-TACL Telecommunications Accessibility Checklist. Technical Paper. Geneva, Switzerland: ITU. Retrieved from: https://www.itu.int/en/publications/Pages/publications.aspx?lang=en&media= electronic&parent=T-TUT-FSTP-2006-TACL
  4. Iwarsson, S. and Ståhl, A. (2003). Accessibility, usability and universal design- positioning and definition of concepts describing person-environment relationships. Disability and Rehabilitation, 25(2), 57-66.
  5. Lid, I. M. (2009). What can be achieved by universal design? An investigation of various aspects of the concept. FORMakademisk 2009 (17), 17-27.
  6. -(2014). Universal Design and disability: an interdisciplinary perspective. Disability and Rehabilitation 36 (16), 1344-1349.
  7. Matamala, A. and Orero, P. (2013). Standardising audio description. Italian Journal of Special Education for Inclusion, 1, 149-155.
  8. -(2018) Standardising accessibility: transferring knowledge to society. Journal of Audiovisual Translation 1 (1), 139-154.
  9. Mitra, S. (2006). The Capability Approach and Disability. Journal of Disability Policy Studies 16(4), 236-247.
  10. -(2018). Disability, Health and Human Development. New York: Palgrave.
  11. Molly Follette Story, M.S. (1998). Maximizing Usability: The Principles of Universal Design. Assistive Technology 10 (1), 4-12.
  12. Oncins, E.; Fitzpatrick, D.; Altinier, A. (2020). Mapping The European Digital Accessibility Field: The IMPACT Project. In 9th International Conference on Software Development and Technologies for Enhancing Accessibility and Fighting Info-exclusion (DSAI 2020), December 02- 04, 2020, Online, Portugal. ACM, New York, NY, USA. https: //doi.org/10.1145/3439231.3440608 · DOI
  13. Orero, P. and Matamala, A. (2013). Standarising Audio Description. Italian Journal of Special Education for Inclusion, 149-155.
  14. -. and Tor-Carroggio, I. (2018). User requirements when designing learning e-content: interaction for all. In Evangelos Kapros and Maria Koutsombogera (Eds.), Designing for the User Experience in Learning Systems (pp. 105-121). Cham: Springer.
  15. Montagud ,M.; Mata, J.; Torres, E. and Matamala, A. (2020a). "Audio Subtitles or Spoken Subtitles: An ecological media accessibility service". In Dejica, D. & C. Eugeni, A. Dejica-Cartis (eds) Translation Studies and Information Technology -New Pathways for Researchers, Teachers and Professionals. (pp. 155-167) Timișoara: Editura Politehnica, Translation Studies Series.
  16. -, Delgado, C. and Matamala, A. (2020b). Easy to read standardisation. Some steps towards an international standard. In 9th International Conference on Software Development and Technologies for Enhancing Accessibility and Fighting Info-exclusion (DSAI 2020), December 02- 04, 2020, Online, Portugal. ACM, New York, NY, USA. https: //doi.org/ 10.1145/3439231.3440605 · DOI
  17. Sanford, J. (2012). Universal design as a rehabilitation strategy. New York: Springer Publishing Company.
  18. Puigdomènech, L., Orero, P., and Matamala, A. (2008). The Making of a Protocol for Opera Audio Description. In Pegenaute, L; DeCesaris, J.; Tricás, M. & E. Bernal (Eds.) La traducción del futuro: mediación lingüística y cultural en el siglo XXI (pp.381-392). Barcelona: PPU.
  19. Taylor, C. (2017) Getting Our House in Order: Moving from Diversity to Inclusion. The American Archivist: Spring/Summer 2017, 80 (1), 19- 29.

Metadata

Authors
Oncins, E., & Orero, P.
Affiliations
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES)
Venue
Hikma
Published
2021-04-22
Volume
20
Issue
1
Pages
71-90
ISSN
  • 1579-9794 (ISSN-L)
  • 2445-4559
OpenAlex
W3157406902
Cited by
13
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 5
FWCI
3.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Hikma (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • European Commission (957252)
  • Generalitat de Catalunya (2017SGR113)
  • Erasmus+ (KA203)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Subtitles and Audiovisual Media
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Disability Rights and Representation
Keywords
media accessibility, accessibility standards, standardization, subtitling, audio description, sign language, easy reading, IEC, ITU, ISO, W3C, communication barriers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Let's put standardisation in practice: accessibility services and interaction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.21071/hikma.v20i1.12886
The paper
Oncins, E., & Orero, P. (2021). Let's put standardisation in practice: accessibility services and interaction. Hikma. https://doi.org/10.21071/hikma.v20i1.12886