Cited by 98Paleontology and Stratigraphy of FossilsPaleontology and Evolutionary BiologyEvolution and Paleontology Studies

TAPHONOMY OF THE UPPER EDIACARAN ENIGMATIC RIBBONLIKE FOSSIL SHAANXILITHES

MEYER, MIKE, SCHIFFBAUER, JAMES D, XIAO, SHUHAI, CAI, YAOPING, HUA, HONG·2012·Palaios

Abstract

Shaanxilithes ningqiangensis is an enigmatic ribbon-shaped fossil from the upper Ediacaran Gaojiashan Member of the Dengying Formation, southern Shaanxi Province, South China. This taxon has also been reported from Ediacaran successions in North China and possibly in Siberia, making it a potential index fossil for interregional biostratigraphic correlation of upper Ediacaran successions. At Gaojiashan, Shaanxilithes ningqiangensis is often preserved along bedding planes of phosphate-rich silty and calcareous shale, with no evidence of vertical intrusion into adjacent beds and containing little to no carbonaceous material. Here, through detailed microstructural and microchemical investigation using a combination of analytical techniques, taphonomic details of Shaanxilithes ningqiangensis and potentially related forms are revealed, showing that these enigmatic fossils are preserved as clay molds. Together with other taphonomic features, such as abruptly bent ribbons, overlapping but not crosscutting ribbons, and co-occurring discoidal structures interpreted as disarticulated sections of the original organism, the new data suggest that Shaanxilithes ningqiangensis is a body fossil consisting of serially arranged units that are discoidal, lensoidal, or crescentic in shape. Shaanxilithes ningqiangensis is not a trace fossil as some previous researchers have suggested.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2110/palo.2011.p11-098r

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
MEYER, M., SCHIFFBAUER, J. D., XIAO, S., CAI, Y., & HUA, H.
Affiliations
  • 1 Department of Geosciences, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061, USA, meygeo@vt.edu, xiao@vt.edu;
  • Virginia Tech (US)
  • Northwest University (CN)
Venue
Palaios
Published
2012-05-01
Volume
27
Issue
5
Pages
354-372
ISSN
  • 0883-1351 (ISSN-L)
  • 1938-5323
OpenAlex
W2117774979
Cited by
98
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 6
FWCI
7.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Palaios (publishedVersion)
  • BioOne Complete (BioOne) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China
  • Institute for Critical Technologies and Applied Science, Virginia Tech
  • Institute for Critical Technology and Applied Science
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
Keywords
clay molds, Dengying Formation, biostratigraphic correlation, body fossils, trace fossils, Ediacaran biota

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review