Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,801

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Journal of Coastal Research: An International Forum for the Littoral Sciences

Open access
·2009·Journal of Coastal Research

Abstract

McCullough, R.M.; Parrish, C.E.; and Imahori, G., 2026. Investigation of SuperDove for satellite-derived bathymetry and comparison with Sentinel-2. Journal of Coastal Research, 42(4), 720-734. Charlotte (North Carolina), ISSN 0749-0208. Satellite-derived bathymetry (SDB) uses multiple spectral bands of satellite imagery to retrieve depth and is increasingly used for purposes ranging from hydrographic survey planning to benthic habitat mapping and poststorm change detection. Turbidity and clouds are major hindrances to successful SDB. The recent launch of constellations of commercial small satellites (SmallSats) may help overcome these challenges, offering much higher revisit rates than conventional Earth observation satellites. In theory, the greater number of overpasses should increase the probability of acquiring at least one scene with suitable water clarity and lack of clouds needed for successful SDB retrievals. However, to determine whether and to what extent SmallSats do, in fact, facilitate SDB, comparing SDB from SmallSats with SDB from conventional Earth observation satellites should be considered in terms of rates of acquisition of usable imagery, achievable accuracies, and maximum retrieval depths. This study evaluated SDB from Planet Labs's SuperDove imagery, as compared with Sentinel-2 imagery, and considered each of these three criteria for 14 test sites encompassing thousands of images. Results showed that the SmallSat constellation increased usable imagery by a factor of 3.5 while providing similar accuracy (no statistically significant difference in the means of the squared errors) and higher resolution across the 14 study sites. Maximum depth analysis was less conclusive but suggested that Sentinel-2 may provide greater maximum depths depending on the bands used. Qualitative assessment indicated that SuperDove imagery more frequently exhibits sensor quality issues, such as band misregistration and blurriness, and that the smaller footprint sometimes necessitates a greater number of scenes to cover a site. Results of this study are currently being used by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration to inform incorporation of SuperDove imagery in operational SDB software.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2112/1551-5036-si.54.fmi

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,801

Metadata

Venue
Journal of Coastal Research
Published
2009-11
Volume
10054
Pages
fmi-fmi
ISSN
  • 0749-0208 (ISSN-L)
  • 1551-5036
OpenAlex
W4214482986
Cited by
1,801
References
0
FWCI
182.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Journal of Coastal Research: An International Forum for the Littoral Sciences. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2112/1551-5036-si.54.fmi
The paper
Journal of Coastal Research: An International Forum for the Littoral Sciences. (2009). Journal of Coastal Research. https://doi.org/10.2112/1551-5036-si.54.fmi

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.