Cited by 3Coastal and Marine ManagementCoastal and Marine DynamicsMarine and Coastal Ecosystems

Socio-Environment Analysis as a Tool for Coastal Management: the Case of Maraú Peninsula, Bahia, Brazil

Filho, José Rodrigues de Souza, Silva, Iracema Reimão, Ferreira, Doneivan Fernandes·2011·Journal of Coastal Research

Abstract

DE SOUZA FILHO, J.R., SILVA, I.R. and FERREIRA, D.F., 2011. Socio-Environment Analysis as a Tool for Coastal Management: the Case of Maraú Peninsula, Bahia, Brazil. In: Micallef, A. (ed.), MCRR3-2010 Conference Proceedings, Journal of Coastal Research, Special Issue, No. 61, pp. 446–451. Grosseto, Tuscany, Italy, ISSN 0749-0208.The state of Bahia has the largest coastal extension among all Brazilian states. This extension includes some of the most desirable tourist destinations within the country. The local preference is directed to the model “sun, sand and sea.” The Marau Peninsula represents one of the most important drivers of economic development in the region. The intensification of activities on the beaches of Maraú results in the increase of tourist flow, real estate development and the establishment of support infrastructure resulting in increasing pressure on local ecosystems. After assessing the degree of anthropogenic changes in this coastal extension, the northern portion stands out as the most impacted area. This includes the beaches of Taipus de Fora, and Três Coqueiros e Ponta do Muta. Recreational capacity assessment of these beaches indicates that Taipus de Fora holds more than 2,000 users in its peak time. This represents, respectively, over 6.5 and 12 times the number assessed for Três Coqueiros e Ponta do Mutá beaches. However, it is important to point out that Taipus de Fora offers greater beach length and width, around twice the area (6.34 m2) to its use…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2112/si61-001.57

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A better understanding of combined anthropogenic and environmental effects on short and long-term coastal landscape evolution is essential for integrated management of the multifunctional potential of coastal areas.

    “A better understanding of combined anthropogenic and environmental effects on short and long-term coastal landscape evolution is essential for integrated management of the multifunctional potential of coastal areas (Tanim et al., 2022;Mavromatidi et al., 2018;Filho et al., 2011).”

Authors
Filho, J. R. D. S., Silva, I. R., & Ferreira, D. F.
Affiliations
  • Instituto Federal da Bahia (BR)
  • Universidade Federal da Bahia (BR)
Venue
Journal of Coastal Research
Published
2011-12
Volume
61
Pages
446-451
ISSN
  • 0749-0208 (ISSN-L)
  • 1551-5036
OpenAlex
W2146455901
Cited by
3
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Coastal Research (publishedVersion)
  • BioOne Complete (BioOne) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Coastal and Marine Management
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Earth-Surface Processes › Coastal and Marine Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Marine and Coastal Ecosystems
Keywords
socio-environmental analysis, coastal zone management, recreational capacity, tourist beaches, support infrastructure, anthropogenic impacts, real estate development, beach use, coral reef conservation, coastal ecosystems, Bahia coast

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review