The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Solubility of Sulfur in Mafic Magmas
Abstract
Factors controlling the solubility of sulfur in mafic magmas are temperature, composition, and fugacities of the gaseous species O2 and S2. In order to determine how these factors control the solubility of sulfur, experiments have been conducted at one atmosphere total pressure and at fO2 and fS2 controlled by mixing of SO2, CO2, and CO. All common mafic magmas are within a range of fO2 and fS2 such that sulfide sulfur is the most important species in the melt. Within this range, a temperature increase of 100 degrees C magnifies the capacity of a magma to dissolve sulfur by a factor of 5 to 7 times, assuming a constant ratio of fO2 to fS2. Increases in fO2 and fS2 cause, respectively, decreases and increases in sulfur solubility. The general relationship between the magma composition and the sulfur-carrying capacity of a magma has also been determined. The strongest positive correlation of sulfur content is observed with the ferrous iron content. Because other components influence the activity coefficient of FeO and thereby the solubility of ferrous iron, their effect on the sulfur-carrying capacity is complex. The maximum solubility of sulfur in a magma of basaltic composition at 1,200 degrees C, was found to vary from 0.05 to 0.2 weight percent as the FeO content was increased from 5 to 20 weight percent. In nature all of the controlling variables change during cooling and crystallization of a magma, and each or all of them may bring a magma to saturation, thereby causing a sulfide phase to precipitate. Under most conditions the sulfide phase which precipitates from a mafic magma will be an immiscible iron-sulfide-oxide liquid.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Jugo, P. J., Wilke, M., & Botcharnikov, R. E. (2010) · Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta · doi:10.1016/j.gca.2010.07.022 · Cited by 555
Luhr, J. F., Carmichael, I. S. E., & Varekamp, J. C. (1984) · Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research · doi:10.1016/0377-0273(84)90057-x · Cited by 503
Self, S., Keszthelyi, L., & Thordarson, T. (1998) · Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences · doi:10.1146/annurev.earth.26.1.81 · Cited by 373
Thordarson, T., Self, S., Óskarsson, N., & Hulsebosch, T. (1996) · Bulletin of Volcanology · doi:10.1007/s004450050136 · Cited by 316
Chemistry and isotope ratios of sulfur in basalts and volcanic gases at Kilauea volcano, Hawaii
Sakai, H., Casadevall, T. J., & Moore, J. G. (1982) · Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta · doi:10.1016/0016-7037(82)90024-2 · Cited by 179
Metadata
- Authors
- Haughton, D. R., Roeder, P. L., & Skinner, B. J.
- Venue
- Economic Geology
- Publisher
- Society of Economic Geologists, Inc.
- Published
- 1974-07-01
- Volume
- 69
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 451-467
- ISSN
- 0361-0128 (ISSN-L)
- 1554-0774
- OpenAlex
- W2102148551
- Cited by
- 514
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Solubility of Sulfur in Mafic Magmas. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2113/gsecongeo.69.4.451
- The paper
- Haughton, D. R., Roeder, P. L., & Skinner, B. J. (1974). Solubility of Sulfur in Mafic Magmas. Economic Geology. https://doi.org/10.2113/gsecongeo.69.4.451
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.