Cited by 138Geochemistry and Elemental AnalysisGeological and Geochemical AnalysisPaleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils

Rare earth elements as hydrothermal tracers during the formation of massive sulfide deposits in volcanic rocks

Graf, J. L.·1977·Economic Geology

Abstract

Massive, tabular sulfide bodies commonly occur within sequences of subaqueous volcanic rocks. They are believed to form as chemical sediments when hydrothermal solutions which derived metals from interaction with the volcanic rocks flow out into sea water. Such a water-rock interaction, hydrothermal exhalation model implies that changes in the composition of the hydrothermal solutions result from changing conditions within the hydrothermal system and that the different metal contents of the resulting chemical sediments are related to different alteration reactions. It is suggested that the rare earth elements (REE), because of their coherent and somewhat predictable geochemical properties, can serve as tracers of the alteration reactions which take place within these hydrothermal systems. Changes in the reactions should be reflected by the REE pattern of the solution which will in turn influence the REE pattern of the resulting deposit.In order to test this hypothesis the REE patterns of massive sulfide deposits and associated rocks from the Bathurst-Newcastle District, New Brunswick, Canada, were determined by instrumental neutron activation analysis (INAA). Interpretation of the REE data was aided by a simple computer model which predicted solution REE patterns resulting from various solution-rock interactions.Chlorite-rich samples have REE distributions and abundances that are very similar to those of shales which suggests a detrital source for their REE. Other chemical sediment samples, except Cu-rich sulfides, have positive europium anomalies. The magnitude of the Eu anomaly and the amount of heavy REE enrichment increase with increasing content of oxide and sulfide minerals. Samples with high contents of Pb sulfides have the highest Eu anomalies and the strongest enrichments of heavy REE and these characteristics do not correlate with the abundance of any other mineral.The observed patterns are best explained by an input of hydrothermal solutions to the site of chemical sedimentation. Because of the characteristic REE patterns and consistent stratigraphic positions of the chemical sediment zones (Cu-rich sulfides, Pb + Zn-rich sulfides, and iron-formation) the following sequence of events apparently took place within the hydrothermal system: 1. Alteration of ferromagnesian minerals and/or volcanic glass released Cu and Fe to the solution (Cu-sulfide zone). 2. Preferential alteration of feldspar by a very concentrated brine enriched the solution in Pb, Zn, Ba, and heavy REE (Pb + Zn-sulfide zone). 3. Continued removal of Fe from the volcanic rocks without alteration of a large amount of the solid phases (iron-formation). Results of the REE study are consistent with the formation of massive sulfide deposits by precipitation from solutions which derived metals from volcanic rocks during water-rock interactions. In fact, the data require that water-rock interactions take place and are incompatible with direct release of magmatic water onto the sea floor. Generation of solutions capable of precipitating Pb-rich massive sulfide deposits requires that phenocrysts of feldspar are present in the volcanic rocks, that the rocks are felsic and that conditions within the hydrothermal system favor alteration of feldspar. A relation should then exist between the metal contents of sulfide deposits and the composition of the host volcanic pile. As expected, deposits in mafic lavas are Cu rich while those in mixed, mafic-felsic piles have Pb + Zn/Cu ratios which increase with the felsic rock content of the volcanic pile.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2113/gsecongeo.72.4.527

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Positive Eu anomalies in hydrothermal fluids are linked to the breakdown of plagioclase minerals within the volcanic rocks underlying hydrothermal vents, as plagioclase is intrinsically enriched in Eu relative to other REE+Y during igneous crystallisation.

    “Positive Eu anomalies in hydrothermal fluids are linked to the breakdown of plagioclase minerals within the volcanic rocks underlying hydrothermal vents, as plagioclase is intrinsically enriched in Eu relative to other REE+Y during igneous crystallisation (Schnetzler and Philpotts, 1970; Graf, 1977, 1978; Fryer et al., 1979).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

Cited by 138

Authors
Graf, J. L.
Affiliations
Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Graf, J. L.
Venue
Economic Geology
Published
1977-07-01
Volume
72
Issue
4
Pages
527-548
ISSN
  • 0361-0128 (ISSN-L)
  • 1554-0774
OpenAlex
W2135994763
Cited by
138
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
FWCI
5.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Economic Geology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geochemistry and Petrology › Geochemistry and Elemental Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › Geological and Geochemical Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
Keywords
rare earth elements, massive sulfide deposits, chemical sedimentation, water-rock interaction, Eu anomaly, heavy REE enrichment, volcanic rock, copper sulfide, iron-formation, feldspar alteration, brine, REE patterns

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review