The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Comparative anatomy of volcanic-hosted epithermal deposits; acid-sulfate and adularia-sericite types
Abstract
Two types of epithermal precious and base metal deposits hosted primarily by Tertiary volcanic rocks have been distinguished through a detailed examination of the characteristics of 16 well-documented epithermal districts. These characteristics include the ore, gangue, and alteration mineral assemblages, the spatial and temporal distributions of these assemblages, host-rock composition, age relations between ore deposition and emplacement of the host rock, size of the district, temperatures of mineral deposition, chemical composition of the fluids, paleodepth estimates, origin(s) of the fluids, and regional geologic setting. The relative value of each of these features for distinguishing epithermal precious and base metal deposits is estimated. The vein and alteration mineral assemblages are the most important factors, and age relations between ore deposition and emplacement of host rock also appear to be significant. The two major types are designated the acid-sulfate type (Goldfield, Nevada) and the adularia-sericite type (Creede, Colorado; Round Mountain, Nevada). Both types have gold-rich and silver-rich subsets. Base metal contents in the acid-sulfate-type deposit are relatively high and relatively copper rich; there is a wide range in the base metal contents in the adularia-sericite-type deposit, although most are relatively copper poor. Adularia-sericite-type deposits are considerably more abundant than acid-sulfate-type deposits.The two types of deposits appear to form under similar pressure-temperature conditions but in different geological and geochemical environments in ancient geothermal systems. The acid-sulfate-type deposit forms in the root zones of volcanic domes from acid waters that contain residual magmatic volatiles. The adularia-sericite-type deposit forms in a geothermal system where surficial waters mix with deeper, heated saline waters in a lateral flow regime, high above and probably offset from a heat source at depth; neutral to weakly acidic, alkali chloride waters are dominant.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Rodriguez-Galiano, V., Sanchez-Castillo, M., Chica-Olmo, M., & Chica-Rivas, M. (2015) · Ore Geology Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.oregeorev.2015.01.001 · Cited by 1,576
(2005) · Volcanic, Geothermal, and Ore-Forming Fluids · doi:10.5382/sp.10.16 · Cited by 531
Dill, H. G. (2010) · Earth-Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2009.10.011 · Cited by 431
The characteristics, origins, and geodynamic settings of supergiant gold metallogenic provinces
Kerrich, R., Goldfarb, R., Groves, D., Garwin, S., & Jia, Y. (2000) · Science in China Series D: Earth Sciences · doi:10.1007/bf02911933 · Cited by 355
Rye, R. O. (2005) · Chemical Geology · doi:10.1016/j.chemgeo.2004.06.034 · Cited by 320
Metadata
- Authors
- Heald, P., Foley, N. K., & Hayba, D. O.
- Venue
- Economic Geology
- Publisher
- Society of Economic Geologists, Inc.
- Published
- 1987-02-01
- Volume
- 82
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-26
- ISSN
- 0361-0128 (ISSN-L)
- 1554-0774
- OpenAlex
- W2164793693
- Cited by
- 598
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparative anatomy of volcanic-hosted epithermal deposits; acid-sulfate and adularia-sericite types. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2113/gsecongeo.82.1.1
- The paper
- Heald, P., Foley, N. K., & Hayba, D. O. (1987). Comparative anatomy of volcanic-hosted epithermal deposits; acid-sulfate and adularia-sericite types. Economic Geology. https://doi.org/10.2113/gsecongeo.82.1.1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.