The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Nanoscale Gas Flow in Shale Gas Sediments
Abstract
Production of gas out of low permeability shale packages is very recent in the Western Canadian Sedimentary Basin (WCSB). The process of gas release and production from shale gas sediments is not well understood. Because of adsorptive capacity of certain shale constituents, including organic carbon content, coalbed methane models are sometimes being applied to model and simulate tight shale gas production behaviour. Alternatively, conventional Darcy flow models are sometimes applied to tight shale gas. However, neither of these approaches takes into account the differences in transport mechanisms in shale due to additional nanopore networks. Hence, the application of existing models for shale results in erroneous evaluation and predictions. Our analysis shows that a combination of a nanopore network connected to a micrometre pore network controls the gas flow in shale. Mathematical modelling of gas flow in nanopores is difficult since the standard assumption of no-slip boundary conditions in the Navier-Stokes equation breaks down at the nanometre scale, while the computational times of applicable molecular-dynamics (MD) codes become exorbitant. We found that the gas flow in nanopores of the shale can be modeled with a diffusive transport regime with a constant diffusion coefficient and negligible viscous effects. The obtained diffusion coefficient is consistent with the Knudsen diffusivity which supports the slip boundary condition at the nanopore surfaces. This model can be used for shale gas evaluation and production optimization. Introduction: Shale gas is a type of reservoir classified under the Unconventional Gas heading. These ‘difficult to produce’ reservoirs will play an increasingly important role in Canadian gas production because they are showing the potential to offset declining conventional gas production. Quite simply, shale gas is natural gas produced from shale sequences. Gas shales are predominantly lithified clays with organic material and detrital minerals present in varying amounts. Organic matter is an integral constituent of a productive shale gas reservoir. In addition, these fine-grained rocks are microporous, causing low permeabilities. While shale gas production has had a long history in the United States, dating back about 80 years, it is still at the very early stages of commercial production in Canada. Very little public data exists on shale gas production, yet industry interest is on the rise. A variety of estimates indicate that between 550 and 860 trillion cubic feet of gas-in-place could exist in potential shale gas formations in Western Canada(1,2). But shales can be difficult to evaluate using conventional laboratory techniques. Much of this has to do with resident clays that can have bound water either as part of their matrix or loosely bound in the interlayers in amounts of 75 to 80%. Another challenge can be the accurate measurement of in situ permeabilities, which are on the nanoscale. Core samples have often been subjected to coring induced or stress release fractures, resulting in greatly overstated permeability measurements. While some shales in Western Canada are, at this early stage, showing the proper geochemical and reservoir properties to support gas production, new techniques need to be developed to more accurately understand shale properties and their productive potential.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Molecular Gas Dynamics And The Direct Simulation Of Gas Flows
Bird, G. A. (1994) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198561958.001.0001 · Cited by 7,269
Continuum Deductions from Molecular Hydrodynamics
Koplik, J., & Banavar, J. R. (1995) · Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics · doi:10.1146/annurev.fl.27.010195.001353 · Cited by 334
Hadjiconstantinou, N. G. (2006) · Physics of Fluids · doi:10.1063/1.2393436 · Cited by 238
An Introduction to the Properties of Fluids and Solids
Mohtadi, M. F., Heidemann, R. A., & Jeje, A. A. (1984) · Cited by 42
Cited by
Modeling of multi-scale transport phenomena in shale gas production — A critical review
Wang, H., Chen, L., Qu, Z., Yin, Y., Kang, Q., Yu, B., & Tao, W.-Q. (2020) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.114575 · Cited by 293
Metadata
- Authors
- Javadpour, F., Fisher, D., & Unsworth, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology
- Publisher
- Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE)
- Published
- 2007-10-01
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 10
- ISSN
- 0021-9487 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2019006773
- Cited by
- 1,201
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 10.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nanoscale Gas Flow in Shale Gas Sediments. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2118/07-10-06
- The paper
- Javadpour, F., Fisher, D., & Unsworth, M. (2007). Nanoscale Gas Flow in Shale Gas Sediments. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology. https://doi.org/10.2118/07-10-06
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.