PreprintCited by 72Protein Structure and DynamicsMachine Learning in BioinformaticsComputational Drug Discovery Methods

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Rotamer-Free Protein Sequence Design Based on Deep Learning and Self-Consistency

Open access

Preprint — published as 10.1038/s43588-022-00273-6 · Paper page

Abstract

We present ABACUS-R, a method based on deep learning for designing amino acid sequences that autonomously fold into a given target backbone. This method predicts the sidechain type of a central residue from its 3-D local environment by using an encoder-decoder network trained with a multi-task learning strategy. The environmental features encoded by the network include the types but not the conformations of the sidechains of surrounding residues. This eliminates the needs for reconstructing and optimizing sidechain structures, and drastically simplifies the sequence design process. Thus iteratively applying the encoder-decoder to different central residues is able to produce self-consistent overall sequences for a target backbone. Extensive results of wet experiments, including five structures solved by X-ray crystallography, show that ABACUS-R outperforms state-of-the-art energy function-based de novo sequence design methods by significant margins in success rate and design precision. ABACUS-R constitutes a robust tool for wide applications in protein design and protein engineering.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.21203/rs.3.rs-1209166/v1

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Metadata

Authors
Liu, Y., Zhang, L., Wang, W., Zhu, M., Wang, C., Li, F., Zhang, J., Li, H., Chen, Q., & Liu, H.
Affiliations
University of Science and Technology of China (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Li, Houqiang
  • Chen, Quan
  • Liu, Haiyan
Venue
Nature Computational Science
Published
2022-02-01
Volume
2
Issue
7
Pages
451-462
ISSN
2662-8457 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4286491305
Cited by
72
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 6
FWCI
5.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Computational Science (publishedVersion)
  • Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (21773220, 32171411)
  • Youth Innovation Promotion Association of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (2017494)
  • National Key Research and Development Program of China
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Drug Discovery › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
Keywords
protein sequence design, encoder-decoder architecture, multi-task learning, self-consistency, protein folding

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review