Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
PreprintCited by 268

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Dispensing errors in hospital pharmacies: A prospective study in Yemen

Open access
Al-Worafi, Yaser Mohammed, Elkalmi, Ramadan Mohamed, Ming, Long Chiau, Othman, Gamil, Halboup, Abdulsalam M., Battah, Mohammed Mohammed, Dhabali, Abdullah Ahmed, Jaber, Amamr Ali Saleh, Al-Shami, Abdulkareem Mohammed, Alakhali, Khaled M., Alseragi, Wafa Mohammed, Alshakhshir, Sami Mustafa, Alshahrani, Sultan M., Mani, Vasudevan·2021

Abstract

AimsThe aim of this study was to describe the dispensing errors that occurred during the dispensing process in selected hospital pharmacies in Sana’a, Yemen; and to describe their types and causes.MethodologyA prospective study was carried out in selected hospital pharmacies in Yemen over 40 days using a validated tool. ResultsA total of 9000 dispensed prescriptions were evaluated for the dispensing errors and 2.13 % dispensing errors were identified. Wrong dosage form (134/192); wrong strength (24/192); wrong drug (18/192); wrong quantity, wrong instructions written and drug available in the pharmacy but not given were (6/192) and dispense the expired drugs (3/192) were the reported dispensing errors in this study. Poor handwriting, similar drug names, similar drug packaging, fatigue, heavy work, workforce issues, and poor communication were the most common reported causes of dispensing errors. ConclusionThe prevalence of dispensing errors in this study was 2.13%. Pharmacists can play an important role in the improving the safety of medicines. Study of the dispensing errors incidence in national wide, it's types and causes of dispensing errors are very important and highly recommended. Study the impact of different interventions to improve dispensing quality, reducing and preventing dispensing errors are strongly recommended.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.21203/rs.3.rs-153952/v1

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Metadata

Authors
Al-Worafi, Y. M., Elkalmi, R. M., Ming, L. C., Othman, G., Halboup, A. M., Battah, M. M., Dhabali, A. A., Jaber, A. A. S., Al-Shami, A. M., Alakhali, K. M., Alseragi, W. M., Alshakhshir, S. M., Alshahrani, S. M., & Mani, V.
Published
2021-01-25
OpenAlex
W6958053656
Cited by
268
References
4
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dispensing errors in hospital pharmacies: A prospective study in Yemen. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.21203/rs.3.rs-153952/v1
The paper
Al-Worafi, Y. M., Elkalmi, R. M., Ming, L. C., Othman, G., Halboup, A. M., Battah, M. M., Dhabali, A. A., Jaber, A. A. S., Al-Shami, A. M., Alakhali, K. M., Alseragi, W. M., Alshakhshir, S. M., Alshahrani, S. M., & Mani, V. (2021). Dispensing errors in hospital pharmacies: A prospective study in Yemen. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-153952/v1

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.