PreprintCited by 248Protein Structure and DynamicsEnzyme Structure and FunctionMachine Learning in Bioinformatics

AlphaFold2 models indicate that protein sequence determines both structure and dynamics

Open access
Guo, Hao-Bo, Perminov, Alexander, Bekele, Selemon, Kedziora, Gary, Farajollahi, Sanaz, Varaljay, Vanessa, Hinkle, Kevin, Molinero, Valeria +5 more·2022·Scientific Reports

Preprint — published as 10.1038/s41598-022-14382-9 · Paper page

Abstract

AlphaFold 2 (AF2) has placed Molecular Biology in a new era where we can visualize, analyze and interpret the structures and functions of all proteins solely from their primary sequences. We performed AF2 structure predictions for various protein systems, including globular proteins, a multi-domain protein, an intrinsically disordered protein (IDP), a randomized protein, two larger proteins (> 1000 AA), a heterodimer and a homodimer protein complex. Our results show that along with the three dimensional (3D) structures, AF2 also decodes protein sequences into residue flexibilities via both the predicted local distance difference test (pLDDT) scores of the models, and the predicted aligned error (PAE) maps. We show that PAE maps from AF2 are correlated with the distance variation (DV) matrices from molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, which reveals that the PAE maps can predict the dynamical nature of protein residues. Here, we introduce the AF2-scores, which are simply derived from pLDDT scores and are in the range of [0, 1]. We found that for proteins with good multisequence alignment (MSA) depths, including large proteins and protein complexes, the AF2-scores are highly correlated with the root mean square fluctuations (RMSF) calculated from MD simulations. For proteins with little or no MSA hits (the IDP and randomized protein), the AF2-scores do not correlate with the RMSF from MD, especially for the intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs). Our results indicate that the protein structures predicted by AF2 also convey information of the residue flexibility, i.e., protein dynamics.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.21203/rs.3.rs-1666858/v1

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 86 · Cited by 248

Authors
Guo, H.-B., Perminov, A., Bekele, S., Kedziora, G., Farajollahi, S., Varaljay, V., Hinkle, K., Molinero, V., Meister, K., Hung, C., Dennis, P., Kelley-Loughnane, N., & Berry, R.
Affiliations
  • United States Air Force Research Laboratory (US)
  • Wright-Patterson Air Force Base (US)
  • University of Dayton (US)
  • University of Utah (US)
  • Max Planck Institute for Polymer Research (DE)
  • Air Force Research Laboratory
Corresponding author
Berry, Rajiv
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2022-05-18
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
10696-10696
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4283326616
Cited by
248
References
86
Citations by year
2026: 42 · 2025: 94 · 2024: 64 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 5
FWCI
16.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Office of Science
  • Multidisciplinary University Research Initiative (FA9550-20-1-0351)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
Keywords
AlphaFold2, protein structure prediction, protein dynamics, pLDDT, protein complexes, intrinsically disordered proteins, heterodimer, homodimer, RMSF, distance variation
MeSH terms
Amino Acid Sequence, Furylfuramide, Protein Conformation, Molecular Dynamics Simulation, Intrinsically Disordered Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review