PreprintCited by 11RNA and protein synthesis mechanismsProtein Structure and DynamicsMachine Learning in Bioinformatics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

RNA Contact Prediction by Data Efficient Deep Learning

Open access

Preprint — published as 10.1038/s42003-023-05244-9 · Paper page

Abstract

On the path to full understanding of the structure-function relationship or even design of RNA, structure prediction would offer an intriguing complement to experimental efforts. Any deep learning on RNA structure, however, is hampered by the sparsity of labeled training data. Utilizing the limited data available, we here focus on predicting spatial adjacencies (”contact maps”) as a proxy for 3D structure. We explore the space of self-supervised learning for RNA multiple sequence alignments and focus on downstream contact prediction from latent attention maps. Boosted decision trees in particular advance contact prediction quality and can be further enhanced by finetuning the pretrained backbone. Impressively, they double the precision of contact prediction/ reduce false positives by a factor of five over the baseline. We name our model BARNACLE. Our conceptional advance could prove a breakthrough in decreasing the sequence-structure gap for RNA and is generalize-able to other tasks.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.21203/rs.3.rs-2338256/v1

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Metadata

Authors
Taubert, O., Lehr, F. V. D., Bazarova, A., Faber, C., Weiel, M., Knechtges, P., Debus, C., Coquelin, D., Basermann, A., Streit, A., Kesselheim, S., Götz, M., & Schug, A.
Affiliations
  • Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (DE)
  • DLR
  • Forschungszentrum Jülich (DE)
  • Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e. V. (DLR) (DE)
Corresponding author
  • Götz, Markus
  • Schug, Alexander
Venue
Communications Biology
Published
2023-01-11
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
913-913
ISSN
2399-3642 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4386479765
Cited by
11
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3
FWCI
0.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Communications Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • elib (German Aerospace Center) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Helmholtz Association (ZT-I-PF-5-18, ZT-I-0003)
  • Helmholtz Artificial Intelligence Cooperation Unit
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
Keywords
RNA structure prediction, barnacles, self-supervised pre-training, XGBoost, sparse labeled data, data-efficient deep learning, structure-function relationship, RNA design
MeSH terms
Deep Learning, Animals, Thoracica, Records, RNA, Neural Networks, Computer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review