The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
RNA Contact Prediction by Data Efficient Deep Learning
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1038/s42003-023-05244-9 · Paper page
Abstract
On the path to full understanding of the structure-function relationship or even design of RNA, structure prediction would offer an intriguing complement to experimental efforts. Any deep learning on RNA structure, however, is hampered by the sparsity of labeled training data. Utilizing the limited data available, we here focus on predicting spatial adjacencies (”contact maps”) as a proxy for 3D structure. We explore the space of self-supervised learning for RNA multiple sequence alignments and focus on downstream contact prediction from latent attention maps. Boosted decision trees in particular advance contact prediction quality and can be further enhanced by finetuning the pretrained backbone. Impressively, they double the precision of contact prediction/ reduce false positives by a factor of five over the baseline. We name our model BARNACLE. Our conceptional advance could prove a breakthrough in decreasing the sequence-structure gap for RNA and is generalize-able to other tasks.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Flagged first, then by citations
Metadata
- Authors
- Taubert, O., Lehr, F. V. D., Bazarova, A., Faber, C., Weiel, M., Knechtges, P., Debus, C., Coquelin, D., Basermann, A., Streit, A., Kesselheim, S., Götz, M., & Schug, A.
- Affiliations
- Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (DE)
- DLR
- Forschungszentrum Jülich (DE)
- Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e. V. (DLR) (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Götz, Markus
- Schug, Alexander
- ORCID
- Venue
- Communications Biology
- Published
- 2023-01-11
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 913-913
- ISSN
- 2399-3642 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC10482910
- OpenAlex
- W4386479765
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3
- FWCI
- 0.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Communications Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- elib (German Aerospace Center) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Helmholtz Association (ZT-I-PF-5-18, ZT-I-0003)
- Helmholtz Artificial Intelligence Cooperation Unit
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
- Keywords
- RNA structure prediction, barnacles, self-supervised pre-training, XGBoost, sparse labeled data, data-efficient deep learning, structure-function relationship, RNA design
- MeSH terms
- Deep Learning, Animals, Thoracica, Records, RNA, Neural Networks, Computer
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review