PreprintCited by 3Fungal and yeast genetics researchGlycosylation and Glycoproteins ResearchPlant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Janus-faced fucose as a nutrient ligand for Dikarya and a building block of Early Diverging Lineages

Open access

Preprint — published as 10.1186/s43008-023-00123-8

Abstract

Fucose is a deoxyhexose sugar present and studied in mammals. The process of fucosylation has been the primary focus in studies relating to fucose in animals due to the presence of fucose in Lewis antigens. Very few studies have reported its presence in Fungi, mostly in Mucoromycotina. The constitution of 25% and 12% of this sugar in the carbohydrates of cell wall in the respective Umbelopsis and Mucorales strains boosts the need to bridge the gap of knowledge on fucose metabolism across the fungal tree of life. In the absence of a network map involving fucose proteins, we carried out an in-silico approach to construct the fucose metabolic map in Fungi. We analyzed the taxonomic distribution of 85 protein families in Fungi including diverse early diverging fungal lineages. The expression of fucose-related protein-coding genes proteins was validated with the help of transcriptomic data originating from representatives of early diverging fungi. We found proteins involved in several metabolic activities apart from fucosylation such as synthesis, transport and binding. Most of the identified protein families are shared with Metazoa suggesting an ancestral origin in Opisthokonta. However, the overall complexity of fucose metabolism is greater in Metazoa than in Fungi. Massive gene loss has shaped the evolutionary history of these metabolic pathways leading to a repeated complete deletion in most yeast-forming lineages. Our results point to a distinctive mode of utilization of fucose among fungi belonging to Dikarya and the early diverging lineages. While Dikarya used fucose as a source of nutrients for metabolism, the early diverging group of fungi depended on fucose as a building block and signaling compound.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.21203/rs.3.rs-2598461/v1

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Fig. 1 Distribution of fucose-related proteins among the fungal tree of life. Enzymes involved in GDP-L-fucose synthesis are denoted with red squares, transferases with green, enzymes involved in degradation of complex compounds with blue and lectins with orange. The partially colored squares denote single occurrences. In the case of Basidiobolus spp. and Endogonales, the distribution of proteins is often outstanding from the rest of their taxa (see Additional file 1). The schematic tree is based on (Davis et al. 2019) and (Spatafora et al. 2016)
Fig. 1 Distribution of fucose-related proteins among the fungal tree of life. Enzymes involved in GDP-L-fucose synthesis are denoted with red squares, transferases with green, enzymes involved in degradation of complex compounds with blue and lectins with orange. The partially colored squares denote single occurrences. In the case of Basidiobolus spp. and Endogonales, the distribution of proteins is often outstanding from the rest of their taxa (see Additional file 1). The schematic tree is based on (Davis et al. 2019) and (Spatafora et al. 2016)CC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 2 GDP-L-Fucose synthesis pathways. Both de-novo and salvage pathways are present in Fungi
Fig. 2 GDP-L-Fucose synthesis pathways. Both de-novo and salvage pathways are present in FungiCC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 3 Fucose-related modification pathways in Fungi
Fig. 3 Fucose-related modification pathways in FungiCC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 4 Unrooted maximum likelihood phylogenetic trees of three fucosyltransferases families (Additional file 2)
Fig. 4 Unrooted maximum likelihood phylogenetic trees of three fucosyltransferases families (Additional file 2)CC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 5 GT-B clan (CL0113) fucosyltransferases present in fungi with new O-FucT subfamilies
Fig. 5 GT-B clan (CL0113) fucosyltransferases present in fungi with new O-FucT subfamiliesCC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 6 Sequence logos of active site and GDP-fucose-binding motifs for selected subfamilies (see description in the text above). Animal O-FuT is shown as a reference (Chen et al. 2012). Letters correspond to clusters pictured in Fig. 5 (clans)
Fig. 6 Sequence logos of active site and GDP-fucose-binding motifs for selected subfamilies (see description in the text above). Animal O-FuT is shown as a reference (Chen et al. 2012). Letters correspond to clusters pictured in Fig. 5 (clans)CC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 7 Catabolic pathways of fucose-containing compounds. Homologs of enzymes defined in MetaCyc pathways present in Fungi are marked in green; red-marked enzymes are not present in Fungi; products of reactions marked in yellow have been detected in Fungi but corresponding protein and gene sequences are not known or reported enzymes show marginal specificity (e.g., AA12 as fucose dehydrogenase and lactonase)
Fig. 7 Catabolic pathways of fucose-containing compounds. Homologs of enzymes defined in MetaCyc pathways present in Fungi are marked in green; red-marked enzymes are not present in Fungi; products of reactions marked in yellow have been detected in Fungi but corresponding protein and gene sequences are not known or reported enzymes show marginal specificity (e.g., AA12 as fucose dehydrogenase and lactonase)CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Metadata

Authors
Orłowska, M., Barua, D., Piłsyk, S., & Muszewska, A.
Affiliations
Institute of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Polish Academy of Sciences (PL)
Corresponding author
  • Orłowska, Małgorzata
  • Muszewska, Anna
Venue
IMA Fungus
Published
2023-02-17
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
17-17
ISSN
2210-6340 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4386449453
Cited by
3
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2
FWCI
0.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IMA Fungus (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • IBB PAS Repository (Institute of Biochemistry and Biophysics Polish Academy of Sciences) (acceptedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Narodowe Centrum Nauki (#2021/41/B/NZ2/02426)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases
Keywords
fucose, fucose metabolism, Dikarya, early diverging fungi, Mucoromycotina, gene loss, Opisthokonta, fungal evolution, Mucorales, Umbelopsis, fucosylation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review