PreprintCited by 34Computational Drug Discovery MethodsMachine Learning in Materials ScienceProtein Degradation and Inhibitors

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Benchmarking Compound Activity Prediction for Real-World Drug Discovery Applications

Open access

Preprint — published as 10.1038/s42004-024-01204-4

Abstract

Identifying active compounds for target proteins is one of the most fundamental objectives in early drug discovery. Recently, a growing number of computational methods, especially data-driven methods, have demonstrated promising potential in predicting compound activities. However, there lacks a well-designed benchmark to objectively evaluate these methods from the aspects of practical applications, which can consider the biased distribution of current real-world compound activity data and adopt appropriate evaluation metrics to avoid overestimation of model performances. In this paper, we propose a novel benchmark, named CARA, to systematically evaluate the performances of compound activity prediction models from a practical perspective. To eliminate the biases in current compound activity data, two types of assays, i.e., virtual screening (VS) and lead optimization (LO), were distinguished according to their drug discovery stages. New train-test splitting schemes and evaluation metrics including the assay-based evaluation and success rates were adopted to comprehensively measure the performances of different methods. Evaluation of several state-of-the-art models on our CARA benchmark demonstrated a more accurate, informative, and direct understanding of model performances than the commonly-used bulk evaluation. In addition, another popular application scenario, in which there were a few already measured task-related samples, was also considered by CARA. Evaluation of a number of few-shot training strategies demonstrated their different preferences for VS and LO tasks, further suggesting the necessity of distinguishing the two task types. A useful indicator was also discovered to estimate the confidence of model predictions on the experimentally unmeasured data. Overall, our CARA benchmark can provide a high-quality dataset for developing and evaluating compound activity prediction models, and the analysis results and new findings in this work can also act as useful guidance for drug discovery applications. New challenges and opportunities were also revealed and discussed for improving current data-driven methods.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.21203/rs.3.rs-2768252/v1

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Metadata

Authors
Zeng, J., Tian, T., Li, S., Zhang, Z., Chen, L., Zou, Z., & Zhao, D.
Affiliations
  • Westlake University (CN)
  • Tsinghua University (CN)
  • Silexon AI Technology (China) (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Zeng, Jianyang
  • Zhao, Dan
Venue
Communications Chemistry
Published
2023-04-19
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
127-127
ISSN
2399-3669 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4399347516
Cited by
34
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1
FWCI
6.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Communications Chemistry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Westlake University
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (61872216, T2125007, 2021YFF1201300, 32270640, 31900862)
  • National Key Research and Development Program of China (2021YFF1201300)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Drug Discovery › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Machine Learning in Materials Science
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Degradation and Inhibitors
Keywords
compound activity prediction, benchmark dataset, CARA, assay types, evaluation metrics, few-shot learning, protein targets, data-driven drug discovery

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review