PreprintCited by 4Computational Drug Discovery MethodsMachine Learning in BioinformaticsMachine Learning in Materials Science

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Deep learning-based classification model for GPR151 activator activity prediction

Open access
Xu, Huangchao, Zhang, Baohua, Liu, Qian·2023·BMC Bioinformatics

Preprint — published as 10.1186/s12859-023-05369-y · Paper page

Abstract

Background: GPR151 is a kind of protein belonging to G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) family that is closely associated with a variety of physiological and pathological processes. The potential use of GPR151 as a therapeutic target for the management of metabolic disorders has been demonstrated in severalstudies, highlighting the demand to explore its activators further. Activity prediction serves as a vital preliminary step in drug discovery, which is both costly and time-consuming. Thus, the development of reliable activity classification model has become an essential way in the process of drug discovery, aiming to enhance the efficiency of virtual screening. Results: We propose a learning-based method based on feature extractor and deep neural network to predict the activity of GPR151 activators. We first introduce a new molecular feature extraction algorithm which utilizes abag-of-words model in natural language processing to densify the sparse fingerprint vector. Mol2vec method is also used to extract diverse features. Then, we construct three types of deep learning model to enhance the representational capacity of molecules and predicted activity label by five different classifiers. Our method is evaluated on the GPR151 activator dataset built in this paper. The results demonstrate high classification accuracy and stability, with the optimal model Mol2vec-CNN significantly improving performance across multiple classifiers. The svm classifier achieves the best accuracy of 0.92 and F1 score of 0.76 which indicates promising applications for our method in the field of activity prediction. Conclusion: All the experimental results show that the performance of feature extraction algorithm is better than that of the traditional classifiers and the proposed method is appropriately designed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.21203/rs.3.rs-2825069/v1

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Fig. 1 Classification of molecular activity prediction techniques based on artificial intelligence-assisted drug design
Fig. 1 Classification of molecular activity prediction techniques based on artificial intelligence-assisted drug designCC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 2 The flowchart of GPR151 activators activity prediction pipeline. The pipeline contains two types of molecular features, deep neural networks and traditional feature selection algorithms for comparison, followed by different classifiers to predict activator activity labels
Fig. 2 The flowchart of GPR151 activators activity prediction pipeline. The pipeline contains two types of molecular features, deep neural networks and traditional feature selection algorithms for comparison, followed by different classifiers to predict activator activity labelsCC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 3 The CNN network architecture used in this paper
Fig. 3 The CNN network architecture used in this paperCC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 4 Iteration curves of accuracy and loss values for RDKFP-CNN (epoch=15), MorganFP-LSTM (epoch=50), Mol2vec-CNN (epoch=100) on train and test sets are from top to bottom. As iteration increases, the accuracy of train and test sets rises while loss value decreases in the fluctuation until the convergence
Fig. 4 Iteration curves of accuracy and loss values for RDKFP-CNN (epoch=15), MorganFP-LSTM (epoch=50), Mol2vec-CNN (epoch=100) on train and test sets are from top to bottom. As iteration increases, the accuracy of train and test sets rises while loss value decreases in the fluctuation until the convergenceCC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 5 Confusion matrix of docking and predicted labels
Fig. 5 Confusion matrix of docking and predicted labelsCC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 6 Visualization of rdk fingerprint feature extraction steps on best model CNN. From left to right are the features of raw rdk fingerprint, after encoding and padding, after embedding operation and extracted by CNN
Fig. 6 Visualization of rdk fingerprint feature extraction steps on best model CNN. From left to right are the features of raw rdk fingerprint, after encoding and padding, after embedding operation and extracted by CNNCC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 7 Visualization of morgan fingerprint feature extraction steps on best model LSTM. From left to right are the features of raw morgan fingerprint, after encoding and padding, after embedding operation and extracted by LSTM
Fig. 7 Visualization of morgan fingerprint feature extraction steps on best model LSTM. From left to right are the features of raw morgan fingerprint, after encoding and padding, after embedding operation and extracted by LSTMCC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 8 Visualization of Mol2vec feature extraction on LSTM and CNN model
Fig. 8 Visualization of Mol2vec feature extraction on LSTM and CNN modelCC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Metadata

Authors
Xu, H., Zhang, B., & Liu, Q.
Affiliations
Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Corresponding author
Liu, Qian
Venue
BMC Bioinformatics
Published
2023-04-24
Volume
24
Issue
1
Pages
245-245
ISSN
1471-2105 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4380085318
Cited by
4
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 4
FWCI
0.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Bioinformatics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences
  • Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Drug Discovery › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Machine Learning in Materials Science
Keywords
G protein-coupled receptors, feature selection, virtual screening, drug discovery, deep neural network, support vector machine
MeSH terms
Deep Learning, Algorithms, Drug Evaluation, Preclinical, Neural Networks, Computer, Drug Discovery

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Deep learning-based classification model for GPR151 activator activity prediction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2825069/v1
The paper
Xu, H., Zhang, B., & Liu, Q. (2023). Deep learning-based classification model for GPR151 activator activity prediction. BMC Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2825069/v1