The DOI matches its Crossref record; its reference list is not available.
NMRlipids Databank makes data-driven analysis of biomembrane properties accessible for all
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1038/s41467-024-45189-z · Paper page
Abstract
Cellular membrane lipid composition is implicated in diseases and controls major biological functions, but membranes are difficult to study experimentally due to their intrinsic disorder and complex phase behaviour. Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations have been useful in understanding membrane systems, but they require significant computational resources and often suffer from inaccuracies in model parameters. Applications of data-driven and machine learning methods, currently revolutionising many fields, remain of limited use for membrane systems due to the lack of suitable training sets. Here we present the NMRlipids Databank—a community-driven, open-for-all database featuring programmatic access to quality-evaluated atom-resolution MD simulations of lipid bilayers. The NMRlipids Databank will benefit scientists in different disciplines by providing automatic ranking of simulations based on their quality against experiments, programmable interface for flexible implementation of data-driven and machine learning applications, and rapid access to simulation data through a graphical user interface. To demonstrate how it unlocks possibilities beyond current MD simulation studies, we analyzed the NMRlipids Databank to reveal how anisotropic diffusion of water and cholesterol flip-flop rates depend on membrane properties.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 74 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Ollila, S., Kiirikki, A., Antila, H., Bort, L., Buslaev, P., Favela-Rosales, F., Ferreira, T., Fuchs, P., Garcia-Fandino, R., Gushchin, I., Kav, B., Kucerka, N., Kula, P., Kurki, M., Kuzmin, A., Madsen, J., Miettinen, M., Ricky, N., Piggot, T., Pineiro, A., & Suarez-Leston, F.
- Affiliations
- University of Helsinki
- University of Helsinki (FI)
- Max Planck Institute of Colloids and Interfaces (DE)
- University of Potsdam (DE)
- University of Jyväskylä (FI)
- Tecnológico Nacional de México (MX)
- Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg (DE)
- Sorbonne Université (FR)
- Universidade de Santiago de Compostela
- no affiliation
- Forschungszentrum Jülich (DE)
- Comenius University Bratislava
- Czech Academy of Sciences (CZ)
- University of Eastern Finland (FI)
- University of South Florida (US)
- University of Bergen (NO)
- University of Southampto
- University of Santiago de Compostela
- ORCID
- Venue
- Research Square
- Published
- 2023-06-15
- OpenAlex
- W4380790225
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 74
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Lipid Membrane Structure and Behavior
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
- Keywords
- lipid bilayers, molecular dynamics simulation data, data-driven analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review