Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 1

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Detection of Sybil & DDoS Attacks in VANET using Intelligent Technique

Bhanja, Urmila, Majhi, Ankit, Sahoo, Smrutirekha, Parida, Debapriya·2023
DOI 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3187938/v1
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Vehicular Adhoc network (VANET) are more prone to various types of attacks. Sybil attack is the most dangerous attack in vehicular adhoc network as it creates multiple fake identities and creates traffic congestion.Fake identities are used to enter the network illegally.On the other hand, distributed denial of service (DDoS) attack intentionally blocks the users from accessing any online services. It temporarily disrupts or interrupts the service of the hosting server. These types of attacks in VANET cause severe damage to vehicles, passengers travelling in the vehicles by inducing traffic congestion, and may also cause minor or fatal accidents.Hence, it is highly essential to early detect such attacks in VANET to protect the vehicles and human kind. In this work, a novel model is proposed using fuzzy logic controllers (FLCs) to detect both the Sybil and the DDoS attacks in VANET. Furthermore, performance of attack detection is also analysed and compared with the existing techniques. The proposed model yields better accuracy, sensitivity, and recall value compared to the existing techniques. Margin of error for the attack detection is also estimated for 95% of the confidence interval.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3187938/v1

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 Flow chart of Sybil and DDoS attack detection using Fuzzy Logic Controller in VANET
Figure 1 Flow chart of Sybil and DDoS attack detection using Fuzzy Logic Controller in VANETCC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 2 Flow chart of Trust value Evaluation in VANET
Figure 2 Flow chart of Trust value Evaluation in VANETCC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 3 Membership Function of "Packet Loss Ratio"
Figure 3 Membership Function of "Packet Loss Ratio"CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 4 Membership Function of "SNIR"
Figure 4 Membership Function of "SNIR"CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 5 Membership Function of "Total Busy Time"
Figure 5 Membership Function of "Total Busy Time"CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 6 Membership Function of " DDoS Attack detection Status"
Figure 6 Membership Function of " DDoS Attack detection Status"CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 7 Membership Function of "End to End Delay"
Figure 7 Membership Function of "End to End Delay"CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 8 Membership Function of "Packet Delivery Ratio"
Figure 8 Membership Function of "Packet Delivery Ratio"CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 9 Membership Function of "Throughput"
Figure 9 Membership Function of "Throughput"CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 10 Membership Function of "Sybil Attack detection Status"
Figure 10 Membership Function of "Sybil Attack detection Status"CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 11 "Fuzzy ruler view of DDoS attack Status for High condition"
Figure 11 "Fuzzy ruler view of DDoS attack Status for High condition"CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 12 "Fuzzy ruler view of DDoS attack Status for Medium condition"
Figure 12 "Fuzzy ruler view of DDoS attack Status for Medium condition"CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 13 "Fuzzy ruler view of DDoS attack Status for Low condition"
Figure 13 "Fuzzy ruler view of DDoS attack Status for Low condition"CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 14 "Fuzzy ruler view of Sybil attack Status for High condition"
Figure 14 "Fuzzy ruler view of Sybil attack Status for High condition"CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 15 "Fuzzy ruler view of Sybil attack Status for Medium condition"
Figure 15 "Fuzzy ruler view of Sybil attack Status for Medium condition"CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 16 "Fuzzy ruler view of Sybil attack Status for Low condition"
Figure 16 "Fuzzy ruler view of Sybil attack Status for Low condition"CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 17 Simulation Scenario using OMNET++ Software
Figure 17 Simulation Scenario using OMNET++ SoftwareCC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 18 Simulation Scenario using OMNET++ Software (zoomed version)
Figure 18 Simulation Scenario using OMNET++ Software (zoomed version)CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 19 Scatter Plot & Pearson Value for 4 Attackers
Figure 19 Scatter Plot & Pearson Value for 4 AttackersCC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 20 Correlation matrix while keeping receive broadcast constant
Figure 20 Correlation matrix while keeping receive broadcast constantCC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 21 SNIR Lost Packets under 4,6,8,10 DDoS Attackers
Figure 21 SNIR Lost Packets under 4,6,8,10 DDoS AttackersCC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 22 Total Busy Time under under 4,6,8,10 DDoS Attackers
Figure 22 Total Busy Time under under 4,6,8,10 DDoS AttackersCC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 23 Packet Loss Ratio under 4,6,8,10 DDoS Attackers
Figure 23 Packet Loss Ratio under 4,6,8,10 DDoS AttackersCC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 24 End to End Delay for Sybil Attacks [20]
Figure 24 End to End Delay for Sybil Attacks [20]CC-BY · From the PDF
Image 25
CC-BY · From the PDF
Image 26
CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 27 Performance comparison of DDoS Attack Detection
Figure 27 Performance comparison of DDoS Attack DetectionCC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 29 Comparison of Detection rate for both the DDoS and Sybil Attack
Figure 29 Comparison of Detection rate for both the DDoS and Sybil AttackCC-BY · From the PDF

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. M. Sachdeva, G. Singh, K. Kumar, and K. Singh, "Ddos incidents and their impact: A review." Int. Arab J. Inf. Technol., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 14-20, 2010.
  2. R. Van Der Heijden, "Security architectures in v2v and v2i communication," in Proc. 20th Student Conf. IT, 2010, pp. 1-10.
  3. M. N. Mejri, J. Ben-Othman, and M. Hamdi, "Survey on vanet security challenges and possible cryptographic solutions," Vehicular Communications, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 53-66, 2014.
  4. G. Samara, W. A. Al-Salihy, and R. Sures, "Security analysis of vehicular ad hoc nerworks (vanet)," in 2010 second international conference on network applications, protocols and ser- vices. IEEE, 2010, pp. 55-60.
  5. Z. Xia, S. Lu, J. Li, and J. Tang, "Enhancing ddos flood attack detection via intelligent fuzzy logic," Informatica, vol. 34, no. 4, 2010.
  6. P. B. Pajila, E. G. Julie, and Y. H. Robinson, "Fbdr-fuzzy based ddos attack detection and recovery mechanism for wireless sensor networks," Wireless Personal Communications, pp. 1-31, 2022.
  7. A. Haydari and Y. Yilmaz, "Real-time detection and mitigation of ddos attacks in intelligent transportation systems," in 2018 21st International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC). IEEE, 2018, pp. 157-163.
  8. S. Shamshirband, A. Patel, N. B. Anuar, M. L. M. Kiah, and A. Abraham, "Cooperative game theoretic approach using fuzzy q-learning for detecting and preventing intrusions in wireless sensor networks," Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, vol. 32, pp. 228-241, 2014.
  9. I. M. Tas, B. G. Unsalver, and S. Baktir, "A novel sip based distributed reflection denial-of- service attack and an effective defense mechanism," IEEE access, vol. 8, pp. 112 574-112 584, 2020.
  10. P. Shah and T. Kasbe, "Detecting sybil attack, black hole attack and dos attack in vanet using rsa algorithm," in 2021 Emerging Trends in Industry 4.0 (ETI 4.0). IEEE, 2021, pp. 1-7.
  11. A. Singh and P. Sharma, "A novel mechanism for detecting dos attack in vanet using enhanced attacked packet detection algorithm (eapda)," in 2015 2nd international conference on recent advances in engineering & computational sciences (RAECS). IEEE, 2015, pp. 1-5.
  12. G. Guette and B. Ducourthial, "On the sybil attack detection in vanet," in 2007 IEEE inter- national conference on Mobile Adhoc and sensor systems. IEEE, 2007, pp. 1-6.
  13. M. Maleknasab Ardakani, M. A. Tabarzad, and M. A. Shayegan, "Detecting sybil attacks in vehicular ad hoc networks using fuzzy logic and arithmetic optimization algorithm," The Journal of Supercomputing, vol. 78, no. 14, pp. 16 303-16 335, 2022.
  14. C. Iwendi, M. Uddin, J. A. Ansere, P. Nkurunziza, J. H. Anajemba, and A. K. Bashir, "On detection of sybil attack in large-scale vanets using spider-monkey technique," IEEE Access, vol. 6, pp. 47 258-47 267, 2018.
  15. G. D. Putra and S. Sulistyo, "Trust based approach in adjacent vehicles to mitigate sybil attacks in vanet," in Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Software and e- Business, 2017, pp. 117-122.
  16. J. Grover, M. S. Gaur, V. Laxmi, and N. K. Prajapati, "A sybil attack detection approach using neighboring vehicles in vanet," in Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Security of information and networks, 2011, pp. 151-158.
  17. B. A. Bensaber, C. G. P. Diaz, and Y. Lahrouni, "Design and modeling an adaptive neuro- fuzzy inference system (anfis) for the prediction of a security index in vanet," Journal of Computational Science, vol. 47, p. 101234, 2020.
  18. U. Bhanja, "An attack resistance model for trustworthiness evaluation in vanet," in 2020 IEEE 17th India Council International Conference (INDICON), 2020, pp. 1-7.
  19. S. T. Getaneh, "Enhanced security mechanism to detect sybil attacks in vanets," Ph.D. dis- sertation, Doctoral dissertation, 2019.
  20. J. Grover, M. S. Gaur, and V. Laxmi, "Trust establishment techniques in vanet," Wireless Networks and Security: Issues, Challenges and Research Trends, pp. 273-301, 2013.
  21. N. Kadam and R. S. Krovi, "Machine learning approach of hybrid ksvn algorithm to detect ddos attack in vanet," International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, vol. 12, no. 7, 2021.

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Bhanja, U., Majhi, A., Sahoo, S., & Parida, D.
Affiliations
  • Professor of ETC, Indira Gandhi Institute of Technology
  • Indira Gandhi Institute of Technology
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC
Published
2023-07-27
DOI
10.21203/rs.3.rs-3187938/v1
Cited by
0
References
1
Type
Preprint
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (unspecified)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.