PreprintCited by 9Genomics and Phylogenetic StudiesMicrobial Community Ecology and PhysiologyEnvironmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Deepurify: a multi-modal deep language model to remove contamination from metagenome-assembled genomes

Open access

Preprint — published as 10.1038/s42256-024-00908-5 · Paper page

Abstract

Metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs) offer valuable insights into the exploration of microbial dark matter using metagenomic sequencing data. However, there is a growing concern that contamination in MAGs may significantly impact the downstream analysis results. Existing MAG decontamination methods heavily rely on marker genes but do not fully leverage genomic sequences. To address the limitations, we have introduced a novel decontamination approach named Deepurify, which utilizes a multi-modal deep language model employing contrastive learning to learn taxonomic similarities of genomic sequences. Deepurify utilizes inferred taxonomic lineages to guide the allocation of contigs into a MAG-separated tree and employs a tree traversal strategy for maximizing the total number of medium- and high-quality MAGs. Extensive experiments were conducted on two simulated datasets, CAMI I, and human gut metagenomic sequencing data. These results demonstrate that Deepurify significantly outperforms other decontamination methods.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3420465/v1

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Metadata

Authors
Zhang, L., Zou, B., Wang, J., Ding, Y., Zhang, Z., Huang, Y., Fang, X., Cheung, K. C., & See, S.
Affiliations
  • Hong Kong Baptist University (HK)
  • BGI Research (CN)
  • Nvidia (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Zhang, Lu
Venue
Nature Machine Intelligence
Published
2023-11-01
Volume
6
Issue
10
Pages
1245-1255
ISSN
2522-5839 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4403197568
Cited by
9
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4
FWCI
1.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Machine Intelligence (publishedVersion)
  • Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Hong Kong Baptist University (IRCMS/19-20/D02, 22201419)
  • Science, Technology and Innovation Commission of Shenzhen Municipality
  • Shenzhen Virtual University Park
  • Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation of Guangdong Province (2021A1515012226)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
Keywords
metagenome-assembled genomes, contrastive learning, microbial dark matter, contig binning, tree traversal algorithms, marker genes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review