The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Deepurify: a multi-modal deep language model to remove contamination from metagenome-assembled genomes
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1038/s42256-024-00908-5 · Paper page
Abstract
Metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs) offer valuable insights into the exploration of microbial dark matter using metagenomic sequencing data. However, there is a growing concern that contamination in MAGs may significantly impact the downstream analysis results. Existing MAG decontamination methods heavily rely on marker genes but do not fully leverage genomic sequences. To address the limitations, we have introduced a novel decontamination approach named Deepurify, which utilizes a multi-modal deep language model employing contrastive learning to learn taxonomic similarities of genomic sequences. Deepurify utilizes inferred taxonomic lineages to guide the allocation of contigs into a MAG-separated tree and employs a tree traversal strategy for maximizing the total number of medium- and high-quality MAGs. Extensive experiments were conducted on two simulated datasets, CAMI I, and human gut metagenomic sequencing data. These results demonstrate that Deepurify significantly outperforms other decontamination methods.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Flagged first, then by citations
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, L., Zou, B., Wang, J., Ding, Y., Zhang, Z., Huang, Y., Fang, X., Cheung, K. C., & See, S.
- Affiliations
- Hong Kong Baptist University (HK)
- BGI Research (CN)
- Nvidia (United States) (US)
- Corresponding author
- Zhang, Lu
- Venue
- Nature Machine Intelligence
- Published
- 2023-11-01
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1245-1255
- ISSN
- 2522-5839 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4403197568
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 4
- FWCI
- 1.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- dx.doi.org
- Locations
- Nature Machine Intelligence (publishedVersion)
- Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Hong Kong Baptist University (IRCMS/19-20/D02, 22201419)
- Science, Technology and Innovation Commission of Shenzhen Municipality
- Shenzhen Virtual University Park
- Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation of Guangdong Province (2021A1515012226)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
- Keywords
- metagenome-assembled genomes, contrastive learning, microbial dark matter, contig binning, tree traversal algorithms, marker genes
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review