The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Navigating protein landscapes with a machine-learned transferable coarse-grained model
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1038/s41557-025-01874-0
Abstract
The most popular and universally predictive protein simulation models employ all-atom molecular dynamics (MD), but they come at extreme computational cost. The development of a universal, computationally efficient coarse-grained (CG) model with similar prediction performance has been a long-standing challenge. By combining recent deep learning methods with a large and diverse training set of all-atom protein simulations, we here develop a bottom-up CG force field with chemical transferability, which can be used for extrapolative molecular dynamics on new sequences not used during model parametrization. We demonstrate that the model successfully predicts folded structures, intermediates, metastable folded and unfolded basins, and the fluctuations of intrinsically disordered proteins while it is several orders of magnitude faster than an all-atom model. This showcases the feasibility of a universal and computationally efficient machine-learned CG model for proteins.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Markov state models of biomolecular conformational dynamics
Chodera, J. D., & Noé, F. (2014) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2014.04.002 · Cited by 776
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Metadata
- Authors
- Clementi, C., Charron, N., Musil, F., Guljas, A., Chen, Y., Bonneau, K., Pasos-Trejo, A., Venturin, J., Gusew, D., Zaporozhets, I., Krämer, A., Templeton, C., Kelkar, A., Durumeric, A., Olsson, S., Pérez, A., Majewski, M., Husic, B., Patel, A., De Fabritiis, G., & Noé, F.
- Affiliations
- Center for Theoretical Biological Physics (US)
- Zuse Institute Berlin (DE)
- Freie Universität Berlin
- Freie Universität Berlin (DE)
- Chalmers University of Technology (SE)
- Universitat Pompeu Fabra (ES)
- Princeton University (US)
- Baylor College of Medicine (US)
- Universitat Pompeu Fabra
- Microsoft (Germany) (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Clementi, Cecilia
- Noé, Frank
- ORCID
- Venue
- Nature Chemistry
- Published
- 2023-11-20
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1284-1292
- ISSN
- 1755-4330 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC12313527
- OpenAlex
- W4412521513
- Cited by
- 65
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 50 · 2025: 15
- FWCI
- 19.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Nature Chemistry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Repositori digital de la UPF (Universitat Pompeu Fabra) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Chalmers Research (Chalmers University of Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (2019745, 1900374)
- International Max Planck Research School for Environmental, Cellular and Molecular Microbiology
- European Commission (CoG 772230, ERC CoG 772230, 772230)
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB/TRR 186, Project A12, TRR186, SFB 1078, Project C7, and A04, RTG 2433, SFB/TRR186, SFB1078, SFB 1114, Projects B03, B08, and A04, EF1-2, RTG 2433, Project Q05, Project C7, 825/2, Project Q05, 825/3, 825/2, 825/3, 825/4, NO 825/2, SFB1114, 825/4, Project A12, Projects B03)
- Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (FAIME 01IS24076)
- Max-Planck-Gesellschaft
- Einstein Stiftung Berlin (Project 0420815101, 0420815101)
- Freie Universität Berlin
- International Max Planck Research School for Advanced Methods in Process and Systems Engineering
- Division of Chemistry (CHE-1900374)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Physical and Theoretical Chemistry › Advanced Physical and Chemical Molecular Interactions
- Keywords
- coarse-grained force field, machine learning interatomic potentials, transferable force fields, protein folding, metastable states, intrinsically disordered proteins, protein mutants, folding free energy
- MeSH terms
- Machine Learning, Protein Conformation, Proteins, Thermodynamics, Protein Folding, Molecular Dynamics Simulation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review