The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Easing accessibility to mass spectrometry imaging using convolutional autoencoders for deriving hypoxia-associated peptide candidates from tumors
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1038/s41540-024-00385-x · Paper page
Abstract
Spatial omics data promise to reveal novel insights into the intratumoral heterogenity of biological parameters of cancer. Mass spectrometry imaging (MSI) allows to study spatially-resolved peptides, metabolites and lipids. Yet, in biomedical research the technology is rarely used for biomarker discovery. Like all spatial omics data, its high dimensionality and multicollinearity imposes special challenges for analysis. Additionally, mass spectrometry technologies typically output mass-to-charge ratio values but not the biochemical compounds of interest. We propose a framework that addresses both issues to make MSI more accessible. We utilized convolutional autoencoders to aggregate intratumoral features of interest from MSI of cancer xenograft models. Exemplified for the parameter tumor hypoxia, which is known to show significant spatial heterogeneity, we highlight that MSI is able to capture these small intensity signals and that autoencoders can preserve them in a lower dimensional space. Complementing MSI with tandem MS data from the same tumor model, multiple promising peptide candidates were derived that were associated with hypoxia. Compared to random forest models, we showed that our autoencoder approach produced more plausible candidates. Considering other spatial omics modalities, the architecture of the convolutional autoencoder can be easily adapted while ensuring high explainability.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Global quantification of mammalian gene expression control
Schwanhäusser, B., Busse, D., Li, N., Dittmar, G., Schuchhardt, J., Wolf, J., Chen, W., & Selbach, M. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10098 · Cited by 6,566
Flagged first, then by citations
Metadata
- Authors
- Bitto, V., Hönscheid, P., Besso, M. J., Sperling, C., Kurth, I., Baumann, M., & Brors, B.
- Affiliations
- German Cancer Research Center (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Bitto, Verena
- Venue
- npj Systems Biology and Applications
- Published
- 2024-01-23
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 57-57
- ISSN
- 2056-7189 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC11130291
- OpenAlex
- W4399046526
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 3
- FWCI
- 0.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- npj Systems Biology and Applications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- mass spectrometry imaging, convolutional autoencoder, tumor hypoxia, biomarker discovery, intratumoral heterogeneity, tumor xenografts, latent space, tandem mass spectrometry
- MeSH terms
- Tumor Hypoxia, Animals, Hypoxia, Humans, Neoplasms, Peptides, Mass Spectrometry, Biomarkers, Tumor, Cell Line, Tumor, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review