PreprintCited by 1vaccines and immunoinformatics approachesImmunotherapy and Immune ResponsesCancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Identification and evaluation of tumor pyroptosis-associated antigens for design a vaccine candidate against lung cancer

Open access
Nguyen, Truc Ly, Kim, Heebal·2024·Scientific Reports

Preprint — published as 10.1038/s41598-024-84792-4

Abstract

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, necessitating the development of new treatment strategies. This study aims to design a novel multi-epitope vaccine targeting pyroptosis-associated proteins (CARD8, NAIP, NLRP1, and NLRP3) using immunoinformatics. T-cell and B-cell epitopes were identified from these proteins and assessed for antigenicity, non-toxicity, and immune-stimulatory potential. Fifteen epitopes with high scores were selected and combined with suitable adjuvants and linkers to form a vaccine construct. The three-dimensional structure of the vaccine was predicted, refined, and validated through molecular modeling techniques. Molecular dynamics simulations confirmed the vaccine's structural stability and flexibility under physiological conditions. Furthermore, in silico immune simulations suggested that the vaccine could elicit strong humoral and cellular immune responses, including high antibody production and robust T-helper and T-cytotoxic cell activation. These findings suggest the vaccine’s potential to generate long-term immunity. While computational predictions are promising, in vitro and in vivo validation is required to confirm the vaccine’s efficacy and safety. This study highlights the potential of targeting pyroptosis pathways in lung cancer and underscores the value of computational tools in accelerating vaccine design. If proven effective in experimental settings, this vaccine could contribute to more effective lung cancer immunotherapies, offering a new avenue for treatment in a disease with limited options.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.21203/rs.3.rs-5329441/v1

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 55

  1. Dela Cruz, C. S., Tanoue, L. T. & Matthay, R. A. Lung cancer: epidemiology, etiology, and prevention. Clin. Chest Med. 32, 605–644. https://doi.org:10.1016/j.ccm.2011.09.001 (2011). · DOI
  2. Bray, F. et al. Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. Cancer J. Clin. 74, 229–263. https://doi.org:10.3322/caac.21834 (2024). · DOI · Paper page
  3. Guo, Q. et al. Current treatments for non-small cell lung cancer. Front. Oncol. 12, 945102–945102. https://doi.org:10.3389/fonc.2022.945102 (2022). · DOI
  4. Amboree, T. L., Paguio, J. & Sonawane, K. HPV vaccine: the key to eliminating cervical cancer inequities. BMJ, q996 (2024). https://doi.org:10.1136/bmj.q996 · DOI
  5. Ortiz Carrodeguas, R. A. et al. Safety and effectiveness of CIMAvax-EGF administered in community polyclinics. Front. Oncol. 13, 1287902–1287902. https://doi.org:10.3389/fonc.2023.1287902 (2024). · DOI
  6. Flores Vega, Y. I. et al. Survival of NSCLC Patients Treated with Cimavax-EGF as Switch Maintenance in the Real-World Scenario. J. Cancer. 14, 874–879. https://doi.org:10.7150/jca.67189 (2023). · DOI
  7. Besse, B. et al. Quality of life (QoL) of OSE2101 in patients with HLA-A2 + non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after failure to immune checkpoint inhibitors (IO): Final data of phase 3 Atalante-1 randomized trial. J. Clin. Oncol. 40, 9094–9094. https://doi.org:10.1200/jco.2022.40.16_suppl.9094 (2022). · DOI
  8. Besse, B. et al. Randomized open-label controlled study of cancer vaccine OSE2101 versus chemotherapy in HLA-A2-positive patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer with resistance to immunotherapy: ATALANTE-1. Ann. Oncol. 34, 920–933. https://doi.org:10.1016/j.annonc.2023.07.006 (2023). · DOI
  9. Papachristofilou, A. et al. Phase Ib evaluation of a self-adjuvanted protamine formulated mRNA-based active cancer immunotherapy, BI1361849 (CV9202), combined with local radiation treatment in patients with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer. J. Immunother Cancer. 7, 38–38. https://doi.org:10.1186/s40425-019-0520-5 (2019). · DOI
  10. Zhou, F., Wang, M., Wang, Z., Li, W. & Lu, X. Screening of novel tumor-associated antigens for lung adenocarcinoma mRNA vaccine development based on pyroptosis phenotype genes. BMC cancer. 24, 28–28. https://doi.org:10.1186/s12885-023-11757-7 (2024). · DOI
  11. Akhtar, N. & Bansal, J. G. Risk factors of Lung Cancer in nonsmoker. Curr. Probl. Cancer. 41, 328–339. https://doi.org:10.1016/j.currproblcancer.2017.07.002 (2017). · DOI
  12. Velloso, F. J., Trombetta-Lima, M., Anschau, V., Sogayar, M. C. & Correa, R. G. NOD-like receptors: major players (and targets) in the interface between innate immunity and cancer. Biosci. Rep. 39, BSR20181709. https://doi.org:10.1042/BSR20181709 (2019). · DOI
  13. Linder, A. et al. CARD8 inflammasome activation triggers pyroptosis in human T cells. EMBO J. 39, e105071–e105071. https://doi.org:10.15252/embj.2020105071 (2020). · DOI
  14. Chen, C. et al. DAC can restore expression of NALP1 to suppress tumor growth in colon cancer. Cell death & disease 6, e1602-e1602 (2015). https://doi.org:10.1038/cddis.2014.532 · DOI
  15. Sanami, S. et al. Design of a multi-epitope vaccine against cervical cancer using immunoinformatics approaches. Sci. Rep. 11, 12397–12397. https://doi.org:10.1038/s41598-021-91997-4 (2021). · DOI
  16. Prawiningrum, A. F., Paramita, R. I. & Panigoro, S. S. Immunoinformatics Approach for Epitope-Based Vaccine Design: Key Steps for Breast Cancer Vaccine. Diagnostics (Basel). 12, 2981. https://doi.org:10.3390/diagnostics12122981 (2022). · DOI
  17. Almansour, N. M. Immunoinformatics- and Bioinformatics-Assisted Computational Designing of a Novel Multiepitopes Vaccine Against Cancer-Causing Merkel Cell Polyomavirus. Front. Microbiol. 13, 929669–929669. https://doi.org:10.3389/fmicb.2022.929669 (2022). · DOI
  18. Ahmad, S. et al. In silico design of a novel multi-epitope vaccine against HCV infection through immunoinformatics approaches. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 267, 131517. https://doi.org:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.131517 (2024). · DOI
  19. Nguyen, T. L. & Kim, H. Integrating immunoinformatics and computational epitope prediction for a vaccine candidate against respiratory syncytial virus. Infect. Disease Modelling. 9 https://doi.org:10.1016/j.idm.2024.04.005 (2024). /09/01). · DOI
  20. Nguyen, T. L. & Kim, H. Discovering peptides and computational investigations of a multiepitope vaccine target Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Synth. Syst. Biotechnol. 9, 391–405. https://doi.org:10.1016/j.synbio.2024.03.010 (2024). · DOI
  21. Rahman, M. M., Masum, M. H. U., Talukder, A. & Akter, R. An in silico reverse vaccinology approach to design a novel multiepitope peptide vaccine for non-small cell lung cancers. Inf. Med. Unlocked. 37, 101169. https://doi.org:10.1016/j.imu.2023.101169 (2023). · DOI
  22. Herrera, L. R. M. Silico Approach in Designing a Novel Multi-Epitope Vaccine Candidate against Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with Overexpressed G Protein-Coupled Receptor 56. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev. 21, 2297–2306. https://doi.org:10.31557/APJCP.2020.21.8.2297 (2020). · DOI
  23. Hermawan, A. et al. Immunoinformatics Analysis of Citrullinated Antigen as Potential Multi-peptide Lung Cancer Vaccine Candidates for Indonesian Population. Int. J. Pept. Res. Ther. 28, 162–162. https://doi.org:10.1007/s10989-022-10467-1 (2022). · DOI
  24. Batool, S. et al. Development of multi-epitope vaccine constructs for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) against USA human leukocyte antigen background: an immunoinformatic approach toward future vaccine designing. Expert Opin. Biol. Ther. 21, 1525–1533. https://doi.org:10.1080/14712598.2021.1981285 (2021). · DOI
  25. Li, X. et al. Prophylactic herpes simplex virus type 2 vaccine adjuvanted with a universal CD4 T cell helper peptide induces long-term protective immunity against lethal challenge in mice. Int. Immunopharmacol. 61, 100–108. https://doi.org:10.1016/j.intimp.2018.05.024 (2018). · DOI
  26. Chan, Y., Jazayeri, S. D., Ramanathan, B. & Poh, C. L. Enhancement of Tetravalent Immune Responses to Highly Conserved Epitopes of a Dengue Peptide Vaccine Conjugated to Polystyrene Nanoparticles. Vaccines. 8, 417. https://doi.org:10.3390/vaccines8030417 (2020). · DOI
  27. Hou, J. et al. Cholera toxin B subunit acts as a potent systemic adjuvant for HIV-1 DNA vaccination intramuscularly in mice. Hum. vaccines immunotherapeutics. 10, 1274–1283. https://doi.org:10.4161/hv.28371 (2014). · DOI
  28. Zhang, Y. et al. FimH confers mannose-targeting ability to Bacillus Calmette-Guerin for improved immunotherapy in bladder cancer. J. Immunother Cancer. 10, e003939. https://doi.org:10.1136/jitc-2021-003939 (2022). · DOI
  29. Zhang, W. et al. Escherichia coli adhesion portion FimH functions as an adjuvant for cancer immunotherapy. Nat. Commun. 11, 1187–1187. https://doi.org:10.1038/s41467-020-15030-4 (2020). · DOI
  30. Consortium, T. U. et al. UniProt: the Universal Protein Knowledgebase in 2023. Nucleic Acids Res. 51 (2023/01/06). https://doi.org:10.1093/nar/gkac1052. · DOI · Paper page
  31. Nilsson, J. B. et al. Accurate prediction of HLA class II antigen presentation across all loci using tailored data acquisition and refined machine learning. Sci. Adv. 9, eadj6367–eadj6367. https://doi.org:10.1126/sciadv.adj6367 (2023). · DOI
  32. Reynisson, B., Alvarez, B., Paul, S., Peters, B. & Nielsen, M. NetMHCpan-4.1 and NetMHCIIpan-4.0: improved predictions of MHC antigen presentation by concurrent motif deconvolution and integration of MS MHC eluted ligand data. Nucleic Acids Res. 48, W449–W454. https://doi.org:10.1093/nar/gkaa379 (2020). · DOI · Paper page
  33. Larsen, J. E. P., Lund, O. & Nielsen, M. Improved method for predicting linear B-cell epitopes. Immunome Res. 2, 2–2. https://doi.org:10.1186/1745-7580-2-2 (2006). · DOI
  34. Doytchinova, I. A. & Flower, D. R. VaxiJen: a server for prediction of protective antigens, tumour antigens and subunit vaccines. BMC Bioinform. 8, 4–4. https://doi.org:10.1186/1471-2105-8-4 (2007). · DOI
  35. Gupta, S. et al. In silico approach for predicting toxicity of peptides and proteins. PloS one. 8, e73957–e73957. https://doi.org:10.1371/journal.pone.0073957 (2013). · DOI
  36. Dimitrov, I., Flower, D. R., Doytchinova, I. & S4-S4. AllerTOP–a server for in silico prediction of allergens. BMC Bioinform. 14 (Suppl 6). https://doi.org:10.1186/1471-2105-14-S6-S4 (2013). · DOI
  37. Dhanda, S. K., Vir, P. & Raghava, G. P. S. Designing of interferon-gamma inducing MHC class-II binders. Biol. Direct. 8, 30–30. https://doi.org:10.1186/1745-6150-8-30 (2013). · DOI
  38. Nagpal, G. et al. Computer-aided designing of immunosuppressive peptides based on IL-10 inducing potential. Sci. Rep. 7, 42851–42851. https://doi.org:10.1038/srep42851 (2017). · DOI
  39. Dhanda, S. K., Gupta, S., Vir, P. & Raghava, G. P. S. Prediction of IL4 inducing peptides. Clin Dev Immunol 263952–263952 (2013). (2013). https://doi.org:10.1155/2013/263952 · DOI
  40. Bui, H. H. et al. Predicting population coverage of T-cell epitope-based diagnostics and vaccines. BMC Bioinform. 7, 153–153. https://doi.org:10.1186/1471-2105-7-153 (2006). · DOI
  41. Nguyen, T. L. & Kim, H. Immunoinformatics and computational approaches driven designing a novel vaccine candidate against Powassan virus. Sci. Rep. 14, 5999. https://doi.org:10.1038/s41598-024-56554-9 (2024). · DOI
  42. Gasteiger, E. et al. Humana Press,. in The Proteomics Protocols Handbook 571–607 (2005).
  43. Johnson, M., W5-W9. & et al NCBI BLAST: a better web interface. Nucleic Acids Res. 36 https://doi.org:10.1093/nar/gkn201 (2008). · DOI
  44. Laskowski, R. A. et al. Structural summaries of PDB entries. Protein Sci. 27, 129–134. https://doi.org:10.1002/pro.3289 (2018). · DOI
  45. Hutchinson, E. G. & Thornton, J. M. PROMOTIF—a program to identify and analyze structural motifs in proteins. Protein Sci. 5, 212–220 (1996). · DOI
  46. Waterhouse, A. et al. SWISS-MODEL: homology modelling of protein structures and complexes. Nucleic Acids Res. 46, W296–W303. https://doi.org:10.1093/nar/gky427 (2018). · DOI
  47. Zhang, Y. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinform. 9, 40–40. https://doi.org:10.1186/1471-2105-9-40 (2008). · DOI · Paper page
  48. Ko, J., Park, H., Heo, L. & Seok, C. GalaxyWEB server for protein structure prediction and refinement. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, W294–W297 (2012). · DOI
  49. Laskowski, R. A., MacArthur, M. W., Moss, D. S. & Thornton, J. M. PROCHECK: a program to check the stereochemical quality of protein structures. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 26, 283–291 (1993). · DOI · Paper page
  50. Wiederstein, M. & Sippl, M. J. ProSA-web: interactive web service for the recognition of errors in three-dimensional structures of proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 35, W407–W410. https://doi.org:10.1093/nar/gkm290 (2007). · DOI · Paper page
  51. Colovos, C. & Yeates, T. O. Verification of protein structures: Patterns of nonbonded atomic interactions. Protein Sci. 2, 1511–1519. https://doi.org:10.1002/pro.5560020916 (1993). · DOI
  52. Abraham, M. J. et al. High performance molecular simulations through multi-level parallelism from laptops to supercomputers. SoftwareX 1–2. GROMACS, 19–25. https://doi.org:10.1016/j.softx.2015.06.001 (2015). · DOI · Paper page
  53. Rapin, N., Lund, O. & Castiglione, F. Immune system simulation online. Bioinformatics. 27, 2013–2014. https://doi.org:10.1093/bioinformatics/btr335 (2011). · DOI
  54. Robinson, C. L., Romero, J. R., Kempe, A., Pellegrini, C. & Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices Child/Adolescent Immunization Work. Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices Recommended Immunization Schedule for Children and Adolescents Aged 18 Years or Younger - United States, 2017. MMWR Morb Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 66, 134–135. https://doi.org:10.15585/mmwr.mm6605e1 (2017). · DOI
  55. Castiglione, F., Mantile, F., De Berardinis, P. & Prisco, A. How the interval between prime and boost injection affects the immune response in a computational model of the immune system. Comput Math Methods Med 842329–842329 (2012). (2012). https://doi.org:10.1155/2012/842329 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Nguyen, T. L., & Kim, H.
Affiliations
Seoul National University (KR)
Corresponding author
Kim, Heebal
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2024-11-05
Volume
16
Issue
1
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7139133375
Cited by
1
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1
FWCI
2.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Seoul National University Open Repository (Seoul National University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Seoul National University
  • Animal and Plant Quarantine Agency
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
Keywords
lung cancer, pyroptosis, multi-epitope vaccine, CARD8, NAIP, NLRP1, NLRP3, T cell epitopes, B-cell epitopes, vaccine adjuvants, TLR activation, immunogenicity prediction, codon optimization
MeSH terms
Pyroptosis, Immunoinformatics, Protein Subunit Vaccines, Animals, Antigens, Neoplasm, Humans, Lung Neoplasms, Epitopes, T-Lymphocyte, Epitopes, B-Lymphocyte, Cancer Vaccines, Molecular Dynamics Simulation, Molecular Docking Simulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review