PreprintCited by 174Machine Learning in BioinformaticsProtein Structure and DynamicsGenomics and Rare Diseases

Embeddings from protein language models predict conservation and variant effects

Open access
Marquet, Céline, Heinzinger, Michael, Olenyi, Tobias, Dallago, Christian, Bernhofer, Michael, Erckert, Kyra, Rost, Burkhard·2021·Human Genetics

Preprint — published as 10.1007/s00439-021-02411-y

Abstract

The emergence of SARS-CoV-2 variants stressed the demand for tools allowing to interpret the effect of single amino acid variants (SAVs) on protein function. While Deep Mutational Scanning (DMS) sets continue to expand our understanding of the mutational landscape of single proteins, the results continue to challenge analyses. Protein Language Models (LMs) use the latest deep learning (DL) algorithms to leverage growing databases of protein sequences. These methods learn to predict missing or marked amino acids from the context of entire sequence regions. Here, we explored how to benefit from learned protein LM representations (embeddings) to predict SAV effects. Although we have failed so far to predict SAV effects directly from embeddings, this input alone predicted residue conservation almost as accurately from single sequences as using multiple sequence alignments (MSAs) with a two-state per-residue accuracy (conserved/not) of Q2=80% (embeddings) vs. 81% (ConSeq). Considering all SAVs at all residue positions predicted as conserved to affect function reached 68.6% (Q2: effect/neutral; for PMD) without optimization, compared to an expert solution such as SNAP2 (Q2=69.8). Combining predicted conservation with BLOSUM62 to obtain variant-specific binary predictions, DMS experiments of four human proteins were predicted better than by SNAP2, and better than by applying the same simplistic approach to conservation taken from ConSeq. Thus, embedding methods have become competitive with methods relying on MSAs for SAV effect prediction at a fraction of the costs in computing/energy. This allowed prediction of SAV effects for the entire human proteome (~20k proteins) within 17 minutes on a single GPU.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.21203/rs.3.rs-584804/v1

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 89 · Cited by 174

Authors
Marquet, C., Heinzinger, M., Olenyi, T., Dallago, C., Bernhofer, M., Erckert, K., & Rost, B.
Affiliations
Technical University of Munich (DE)
Corresponding author
Marquet, Céline
Venue
Human Genetics
Published
2021-06-03
Volume
141
Issue
10
Pages
1629-1647
ISSN
0018-7348 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4225868104
Cited by
174
References
89
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 47 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 2
FWCI
7.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Human Genetics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Informationszentrum Lebenswissenschaften (ZB MED) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • mediaTUM – the media and publications repository of the Technical University Munich (Technical University Munich) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (RO1320/4‐1)
  • Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (01IS17049)
  • Technische Universität München
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomics and Rare Diseases
Keywords
protein language models, protein embeddings, single amino acid variants, variant effect prediction, sequence conservation, deep mutational scanning, Vespa, ProtT5, BLOSUM62, SARS-CoV-2 variants, protein function
MeSH terms
COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Algorithms, Amino Acids, Humans, Language, Proteome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review