PreprintCited by 0Adolescent and Pediatric HealthcareChild and Adolescent HealthMental Health Treatment and Access

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Adequate Care Coordination is Associated with Reduced Unmet Mental Health Needs for Children

Open access
Graaf, Genevieve, Gigli, Kristin, Hughes, Phillip, Thomas, Kathleen·2025·Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal

Preprint — published as 10.1007/s10560-026-01101-w · Paper page

Abstract

Children with special healthcare needs (CSHCN), especially those with mental health needs, often receive services from multiple service sectors, including schools. Thus, care coordination may play a critical role in access to mental health care for these children. This pooled cross-sectional study used multivariable logistic regression with data from the National Survey of Children’s Health (2020-2023), focusing on a subsample of children with caregiver-reported mental health problems and need for mental healthcare. It estimates the prevalence of parent-reported need for and receipt of effective care coordination and provider communication with schools. It also measures the association between parent-reported receipt of these services with unmet need for mental healthcare. Most caregivers reported need for care coordination (51.3%) and provider communication with schools (60.7%). Among those with need, 48.3% reported not having their care coordination needs met, and 57.2% of families reported unmet need for provider communication with schools. The probability of reported unmet mental health needs was 12 percentage points lower when children had all needs for care coordination met and 10 points lower when providers communicated with schools. Results suggest that having care coordination needs met and provider communication with schools may play an important role in children accessing needed mental healthcare.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.21203/rs.3.rs-7906988/v1

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 48

Metadata

Authors
Graaf, G., Gigli, K., Hughes, P., & Thomas, K.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas at Arlington (US)
  • Binghamton University (US)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Corresponding author
Graaf, Genevieve
Venue
Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal
Published
2025-11-20
Volume
43
Issue
4
Pages
1295-1302
ISSN
0738-0151 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7140164696
Cited by
0
References
48
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • The Open Repository - Binghamton (Binghamton University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (K01MH129991)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Child and Adolescent Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
care coordination, unmet mental health needs, children with special health care needs, school-based mental health services, access to mental health care, National Survey of Children's Health

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review